They do this for volatile stocks. Some are 100% long but 200-500% requirement to short. What they really need for bitcoin futures is a 24x7 market. Then at least if it's liquid, the brokers can blow you of your short fast enough they don't lose money and they can offer leverage on the short side. But if it might gap up 2x the weekend, they don't want to be offering more than 2x leverage.Why cant they put a giant req on the short side ONLY. I would trade, regardless. I got plenty of free margin. I'm sure others would too
As mentioned on another thread, CBOE sources say TradeStation, Advantage, RJO are offering the product to retail investors. (Assuming you actually want to trade, rather than just b¡tch.)[/QUOTE
bitching is on the rise on ET but not quit as fast percentage wise as the price of bitcoin.
it sounds like excellent advice from a man who is worth 19 billion. trees don't grow to the sky. buy now. enjoy the spike up as the public joins in and the shorts are squeezed. then sell them and enjoy a long term slide to zero or near zero,I find it interesting, that Peterffy does an interview with CNBC. In one comment he says he will not allow shorting because if Bitcoin spikes, there might be no reasonable place to buy in their customers. In the next sentence, he says Bitcoin is going to near zero in 4 years.
I'm confused.
It's a bit odd to use the word "shorting" for futures contracts in my experience. They aren't 'borrowed' - the contracts simply get created/destroyed as people trade...
Anyway... presuming that by "shorting" they mean initiating a position by selling contracts... If that isn't allowed by lots of brokers, then who exactly are we going to be buying them from?
Creating a one sided market will surely lead to more issues than preventing two-sided trade.
And Wedbush
Hmm, looks like the only major bear market was from end of Jan 2014 to end of Sep 2016. The rest look like simple pullbacks.


Correction: Once I changed the time frame,