Quote from Trader666:
You're totally outed and owned here, cesspool, but instead of addressing it you resort to lame obfuscations... what a pathetic coward
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=2384759#post2384759
In your lame mind.
Quote from Trader666:
You're totally outed and owned here, cesspool, but instead of addressing it you resort to lame obfuscations... what a pathetic coward
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=2384759#post2384759
Quote from Carbonator:
There's no point in calling me uneducated just because I disagree with you. I did not come here to flame.
Furthermore, the comments you deem racist weren't mine. I commented solely on the stupid definition that makes so sense at all.
BTW. I wouldn't say plenty was known about Obama. He was practically unknown prior to his campaign, no media exposure, no track record, no nothing. Nobody really knew Obama. Not that that in itself is disqualifying in my mind, but it certainly is reason for more questioning from the public - a questioning that only happened with people that couldn't stand him in the first place. Those already in love with him never questioned anything (with exceptions, of course).

Quote from Cesko:
In your lame mind.
Quote from Trader666:
Outed and owned here and that's all you can say
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=2384759#post2384759
Why this hostile attitude? I've been here for merely a week, and already I'm being flamed at. Is your trading that bad for you to act this juvenile?Quote from Trader666:
Nope. I called you uneducated based on what you wrote.
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=2384759#post2384759
Saying the definition is "stupid" and "makes so sense at all" doesn't invalidate it and only supports my assessment.
More than enough was known about Obama to judge him on without resorting to pejorative racial stereotyping. So to say the following as cesspool did is racism, pure and simple.
Let's vote for a black guy because we all know how well blacks (generally speaking) can manage their affairs. The whole Africa is kind of testimony for that.
Quote from Carbonator:
I exclusively commented on your definition of racism which I found stupid, as, by that definition, I would be a racist for pointing to the fact that races are different.
Races are different in nature. If I'm a racist for recognizing truth (as a vast majority of Americans also are), somethings wrong with your definition, not my views.
Quote from Cesko:
You can stick your definition up in your ass, because that's "theoretical construct" for me, you know why pinhead? When you take 10,000 people and ask them about their beliefs about race, nobody and I mean NOBODY will tell you the truth. At the same time they will avoid black neighorhoods like a plaque.

Africans, historically, are better performers when it comes to such disciplines as Olympic sprinting. This, I am told, is due to special characteristics of the "African race" (sub-Saharan).Quote from Landis82:
Please feel free to educate me on your above claim in regards to the differences between white anglo-saxon's and African Americans.
I'm curious to learn the differences.
Please be specific in your reply.
Thanks.