Why are moderators posting so much?

Quote from Tsing Tao:

Ok, at first I thought it was just a type, but now it's plain stupid.

Rouge - color.

Rogue - dishonest person.

Not dishonest. As in lone wolf, fast and loose.

Rogue wolves are not with the pack, example will slaughter a herd of sheep and only eat some of it's kill.

I am in no way accusing any mod of killing ET sheep for mere sport...quite the contrary.
 
Quote from satchel:

Not dishonest. As in lone wolf, fast and loose.

Rogue wolves are not with the pack, example will slaughter a herd of sheep and only eat some of it's kill.

I am in no way accusing any mod of killing ET sheep for mere sport...quite the contrary.

A rogue could be a thief or a scallywag, swashbuckler, etc. But your definition is also correct for the word. The problem is, a rogue wolf isn't necessarily doing something negative. According to Surf, a rogue Moderator is. Hence, dishonest is a closer definition for the use of the word.

But thank you for allowing me to exercise my vocabulary!
 
Quote from marketsurfer:

For years I have taken flack for my unconventional tactics and ideas...
No, you've mostly taken flak for bashing everyone else tactics (TA) while bragging about your occasional winner whilst all but ignoring your frequent massive losers.
 
How anyone could be threatened by a moderator on this forum is baffling. They are kinda like a hall monitor in high school. Surf you need to chill man it isn't a big deal if the hall monitor doesn't like you.
 
Quote from oraclewizard77:

I agree, but the clown Marketsurfer can't take it when I point out the losses of his so called PD when he complains about TA. If you live in a glass house, then you should not throw stones. I have never deleted his posts, and I have every right to my view that he can not trade his way out of a paper bag as proven by the public record on ET.

Surf doesn't need me to defend him nor do I have an axe to grind (here, anyway), but the glass house metaphor could be applied to you. I don't see any representation of your performance other than some occasional posts in the PNL thread on very small size. I think the mods should keep the personal shit isolated to chit-chat.

wtf is it to you if he talks shit about TA?
 
That's for your opinion, it's been duly noted I'm sure.

Quote from atticus:

nor do I have an axe to grind but.....I think the mods should keep the personal shit isolated to chit-chat.

 
Quote from Magna:

For someone who keeps returning with new aliases what exactly are you babbling about?


If you do post something enlightening it will be a first. And please stop lying as NO posts in the P&R section have been deleted. This was my recent post there in response to concerns about moderation:


Prior to that my last post in P&R was way back on Jan 8.


Again, what are you blathering about??? I make on average 0.85 posts per day. You on the other hand average 3.71 posts per day which means you post 4X as much as me. :confused: Probably best if you return to those other trading forums you mentioned because you sound awfully confused here. We will miss you terribly.

you are lacking in self control.
 
Quote from Tsing Tao:

And you are lacking in relevancy, as always.


repeating the same thing over and over, acting like a troll, doesn't make your remarks correct.

I suggest you look up the word relevant.
 
Quote from Ricter:

He's got a point, though. Suppose you wanted to put a POS like Tgregg on ignore -- you can't, because he's a "moderator".
+100

Bravo! If a moderator is going to be an asshole in a foodfight forum like P&R (and I can only think of the one already named, thank TPTB), then maybe he shouldn't be a moderator.

Barring that, we should be able to put him on ignore, at least for that one forum. I have no problem with people putting me on ignore, I just should be able to return the favor.

You now know of one mod abusing his status in one forum. Is anything going to be done about it?
 
Back
Top