"Why America was nuked"

Quote from Publisher:

Exactly.

Step 1: Immigration Reform Act of 1965

Step 2: NAFTA

Step 3: CAFTA

Step 4: North American Union

The ultimate and inevitable result is the dragging down of American living standards to that of Mexico through free flow of people and capital and elimination of the USA's borders. As well as the US financing Mexico's economy.

Yet, people are worrying about Muslims in the Middle-East who hate us. We should be saving our own country, not getting involved in the Middle-East. The only reason the Muslims hate us is because of our unconditional support for Israel, which exists solely because "The Lobby" has free reign in Washington.

Jewish extremists have used the American government to invade and kill hundreds of thousands of Iraqis for Israel. And they have killed and maimed us in the process. They have killed tens of thousands in Lebanon, tortured, imprisoned, wounded or murdered hundreds of thousands of Palestinians. The same Jewish media that is destroying the American family, pushing degenerate rap music on our children, promoting porn, drugs, and indiscriminate sex as mainstream, is the same driving force that through modern satellite and broadcasting is exporting this filth to the entire world. Excuse radical Islam?

This entire "Clash of Civilizations" thing is completely controlled by the real enemy. People are being manipulated just as our forefathers got sucked in the the Second World War. Oh, even southern nationalists somehow rationalized their support of this, the most evil bloodletting of European blood in history, from the manipulation of the media. Hitler is against DEEEMOCRACY they pined, as they rushed off to burn their own kin and their babies in the real Holocaust of Dresden.

They did the same damn thing in the cold war, we were so consumed with our foreign enemy we did not deal with the far worse enemy at home who was opening our borders, telling our 12 year little boys and girls that drugs, sex and rap are right on, and that we are evil bastards if we want our kids and grandkids to be moral.


Publisher, I notice you have been making some quite insightful posts. Let's remember, however, that all this is a little too much for the hapaboys of the world.

I am not in America. Though I have lived there, I am in Melbourne, Australia. This year, I have gone back to school to finish a degree in math. In the evenings, I deliver pizzas to one of the most pleasant areas of the city. These suburbs are populated by the type of people who subscribe unquestionably to liberal views on race, culture and foreign affairs, "conservatives" though many think themselves. These are people who furrow their brows and, wagging their fingers, point out that a particular line of reasoning is "racist" in tones that suggest they just detonated the rhetorical equivalent of a neutron bomb. They don't want to hear that that the last fifty years have been an exercise in folly. They don't want to hear about the wrongheadedness of immigration and multiculturalism. That's all too unsettling. They want to be told that everything is fine, that they'll be able to keep going to their six figure paying jobs and consuming their way to nirvana, that despite whatever short term problems may arise, a solution is always on the horizon and everything once again will be fine with the world. With people like this at the helm, only a miracle can save us.
 
It's difficult to know what to think of Iran or Ahmadinejad. It is certain that Islam has historically been an enemy of Europe -- Stephen Decatur didn't lead the attack on Barbary Muslims to protect Israel -- and that the two cultures, European and Islamic, cannot peacefully co-exist within the same territory.

Can Islam be reformed so that at least it does not seek to again reinvade Europe? That is the question we should be asking. Perhaps men like Ahmadinejad genuinely wish to see peaceful relations between our civilizations. All that we require of such reform minded men -- if he is one -- is that they understand that there is no place in European civilization for Islam.

Beyond that, our only concern need be ensuring Islamic countries do not attain a military might comparable to that of Europeans -- or at least not a willingness to use it.
 
Of course, The West has an immediate threat from Non-Western immigration and birthrates. But, with the modern arsenal of the Western world, there is no real threat of physical invasion..

So, the immigration threat is rooted not in the immigrants themselves but the destruction of the European spirit of self-preservation which the Jewish extremists have been the primary destroyers.

I don't think that, as claimed by so many, immigration was ever the result of any plot by Muslims. Muslims and millions of other non-Westerners came to the West because the Jewish propaganda and control opened the doors. They came as individuals for the higher living standards of our countries. You can't completely blame them for that, but one can sure the hell blame the Jewish extremists and their shabbez Goy who did PLOT our destruction. One can blame the Jewish supremacists who led the immigration Movement from Germany to Australia.

We must obviously oppose non-European immigration, Islamic immigration included. But, we must root out its source. If we don't stop the rain, no dikes can hold back the river.
 
Oh, I don't blame individual Muslims themselves. Just as I don't blame individual Mexicans or Asians or any immigrants. You're right, they are only seeking to better their lives. However, their bettering their lives by immigrating to our countries inevitably causes the destruction -- small and insignificant when their numbers are small, rising as their numbers rise -- of our own.

It is the duty of our leaders and our intellectuals to have the foresight to protect us from such outcomes; if not the foresight, then at least the willingness to acknowledge -- and, ideally, reverse -- the mistake once it is clear in hindsight.

There is a danger, then, I think in focusing too much only on the causes of today's disaster -- yes, in large part, Jewish intellectuals -- and not enough on preventing further disaster, and remedying that already caused. A widespread acceptance -- engage your imagination for a moment -- of the Jewish role in western decline would, of itself, do nothing to reverse that decline. It is more important, I think, to move beyond simply blaming Jews, towards seeking solutions.
 
Quote from hapaboy:




Please elaborate on these shaky and most unlikely of foundations [of the standard Holocaust story].


Out of the many pieces I could direct you to, I've chosen this letter from a former Oxford Professor of History, Hugh Trevor-Roper. He is a believer in the standard account -- that being that Germans gassed millions of Jews -- and is writing a letter to Henri Roques, a French revisionist historian best known for having his doctorate revoked for, it appears, having upset French Jewry. In his letter, Trevor-Roper acknowledges that Roques' work has demonstrated the unreliability of Kurt Gerstein's testimony, which had been considered a key piece of Holocaust evidence.

In his letter, Trevor-Roper asks, since the Gerstein testimony must be exluded from the evidence, "What evidence then remains for the gas-chambers?"

In answering, it is notable that Trevor-Roper does not simply point to a standard catalog of abundant evidence. Rather his letter searches for anything that might actually count as evidence, finally settling on Rudolf Hoss's confessions [not themselves without significant problems].

Trevor-Roper's letter also takes as given many other points that revisionists dispute. We can put these aside for the moment. What should at once -- okay, for a beginner, at thrice -- be clear is the utter reasonableness of skepticism at Holocaust claims: If there is no abundant, overwhelming evidence, there is no rational reason to so fiercely affirm the standard account, to the point of jailing and fining dissenters.

Trevor-Roper's letter: http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v13/v13n5p40_Dacre.html
 
Quote from Mom0/pH0x:

spec, when last were you in israel? i can assure you there are several non jewish residents. there are many asian and russian immigrants who are not jewish. there are many non jewish arab israelis. the fact is most people who desire to immigrate to israel are jewish. also, it is easier for jews to immigrate to israel beaurocratically speaking. many arab muslims are and have been citizens, and have israeli passports with all of the same rights as the jewish israeli citizens. all of the arabs inside the green line all have full israeli citizenship with the same rights and responsibilities as every jewish citizen. the fact that israel is mostly jewish has mostly to do with the fact that people who wish to immigrate there are overwhelmingly jewish.

it absolutely kills me how you guys sit around and somehow convince yourselves that all of these social conditions that you identify as being problematic are somehow the product of some anomalous jewish conspiracy. it would be funny if it weren't so sad. that kids and young adults are into sex and drugs because of jews?? LOL ! that jews and jewish intellectuals have somehow socially engineered a way for non caucasian immigrants to arrive and become cultrally pervasive?? that jews control the media and all of the sexualized content in the media(which is ALOT more prevalent in oz and europe than usa where the media is not so ''jewish'')is because of jews, not because that's what SELLS... please cite something to support all of these dubious claims... as a jew who has accomplished family members in a broad plethora of industries i can tell you that jewish business people are just like business people in general, they are in business to make money... not to realize some nefarious colective jewish conspiracy to make arabs and mexicans move into the usa and oz -the fact is that you guys are WAY out in left field here, and i have no idea what sort of rational discourse could lead you to such conclusions.... also, have you forgotten that the vast majority of jews are white caucasians?

like i have always said, antisemitism is the snobbery of white trash... i think you guys are white suprepacists, and when it comes to jews, you guys say the same shit about us, that racist blacks say about whites "they are just trying to keep us down", "it's a conspiracy", "they are trying to turn us against each other, and bring us down from within", within the racial strata, racially oriented thinkers think of groups who are prospering less than them as being inferior, and groups that are more prosperous and functional than them as being conspiratory whereby they blame all the ills of their own race on the races above them on the ladder of prosperity and functionality. you guys are a function of the latter in this case. it's very typical of racially oriented thinkers in general. the arabs in the middle east all live in squalor & opression, yet "it's the jew's fault". many racist american blacks live in abject poverty because the ''white man is keeping them down''. and now we have you guys: everything thats wrong is because of ''the jewish conspiracy''. it's very transparent to anyone willing to take an objective look at the issue. these conspiracy charges are simply an attempt of the racially oriented thinker to transfer responsibility of the condition of his own race...

First, I am no “conspiracy theorist.” I don’t conjure any images of Jewish or any other kind of conspiracies; I simply talk about the realities of Jewish extremist power in media and government that has led America to support the criminal actions of Israel and to wage the disastrous Iraq War and other wars. Conspiracy is one of the words constantly used by our opponents to discredit us. I don’t use the word and have never used it.

The fact is that there is no truly hidden conspiracy. The pursuit of their Israeli agenda by powerful Jewish extremists in America is an obvious fact of life. It is brazen. Who were the advocates of the Iraq War? Who are they that want to compound the disaster of the Iraq War with a new and bigger war with Iran?

Answer, the Neocons, a group of radical Israeli partisans who are overwhelmingly led by Jewish extremists such as Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz, David Wurmser, Douglas Feith, William Kristol, Scooter Libby, Elliot Abrams and a continuing list that looks like the guest list at a Bar Mitzvah.

Years before the Iraq War, Richard Perle, Douglas Feith, David Wurmser and other American Neocons actually wrote a paper for the Israeli Government urging war against Iraq, Syria and Iran as critical to Israel’s agenda. (A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm). These are the very same Neoconservatives who lied us into the Iraq War. You can’t get more brazen and obvious than that. Neo-conservatism itself is a movement that was founded by an extreme pro-Israel radical and former Trotskyite, Leo Strauss. If I am to be labeled a conspiracy theorist than Walt and Mearsheimer must be labeled likewise, for they have precisely repeate.

I guarantee that you could make a very good case that Israel is a racist country. The United Nations ruled as such. Just two weeks before the September 11 tragedy, the U.N. World Conference against Racism labelled Israel a racist, Apartheid state. They were able, through enormous pressure to get that revoked.

It didn’t change the fact that it’s a reality. Israel is about the Jewish people, and they speak very pejoratively against the non Jewish people. They treat the Palestinians worse than dogs. You don’t mass murder dogs, but the Palestinians have literally been genocided. They’ve made life so terrible for Palestinian men, women and children that they’ve cause literally hundreds of thousands to leave their homelands, leave the West Bank, and that’s been their desire. They’ve created a huge concentration camp in West Bank and Gaza…

Your post simply repeated discredited Jewish lies, and contributed in no way to discrediting my argumentation. It's basically a typical ignorant compilation of slander and lies without proving anything.
 
We cannot pull out of Vietnam! The Communists will take over the world and freedom. The commmunists are the new Hitler. History will judge us harshly if we do not stand up to the Red Threat.

To pull out of Vietnam now will be a disaster and will hurt American's saftey. Our Enemies© and those who would like to appease them want us to cut and run. We must stay the course.

It would be an insult to our fallen soldiers to leave Vietnam now.

Oh wait...
 
Back
Top