Who's the Better Trader?

RedManPlus, your gains are so.. consistent!? I'm in awe.

Any advise you could give someone new as far as optimizing hedging goes or optimizing a trading strategy? Books you'd recommend, articles, etc.
 
Maybe Trader A started badly and made a huge recovery to the mathematical point that he/she started with $100 lost 50% the first day and turned that $50 into $135 for a 170% gain. That is much better than the other 25% gain ;)

The point is the person with more money is better no matter how they did it, the decision is made depending on risk calculations...
 
My alter -ego


Quote from TooL:

Trader A finishes the year up 35% after having a max drawdown of 50%.

Trader B finishes the year up 25% after having a max drawdown of 5%.

I think Trader B is the better trader because conservation of capital is the most important skill/talent of any trader/investor. Loss and decay is all around in the market and the universe. Its called entropy. You drop a TV from 100 feet high, it doesn't turn into Green-Blue Chimpanzee with Buffulo Wings and fly away. No it gets smashed into 1000 pieces. You are not a hero after coming back from a huge loss, you're just a lucky. Reward is always related to risk, and by risking more to come back you risk total ruin.
 
Quote from Aaron:

Does anyone else know of any recoveries from such a large drawdown?

Found one: http://www.ditomassogroup.com/DTGDD.htm

Di Tomasso Group's Equilibrium Investment Program has twice had worse than 60% down years and had a worst drawdown of 85%. Incredibly, he's come back to reach a new equity peak. Di Tomasso is profiled in the March issue of Futures Magazine.

Di Tomasso makes fundamental calls on commodity values and doesn't trade financial futures. According to the article he is short crude and long the grains.

Aaron Schindler
Schindler Trading
 
Quote from TheStudent:

I think David Beach's 3x Discretionary fund on IASG recorded a drawdown more than 50% last year.

Investors abandoned the sinking ship and then lo and behold, he finished the year positive.

http://www.iasg.com/SnapshotPT.asp?ID=54

The total yearly returns are abysmal for that amount of risk (maximum drawdown was almost 72%!!!)

Only way to invest in that fund is to wait for 3 or 4 consecutive losing months, or a 40%-50% drawdown and then jump in.
 
Quote from Longhorns:

The total yearly returns are abysmal for that amount of risk (maximum drawdown was almost 72%!!!)

Only way to invest in that fund is to wait for 3 or 4 consecutive losing months, or a 40%-50% drawdown and then jump in.

What if that 50% dd turns into a 80 or 90% dd? You assume that just b/c he had a nice recovery he can do it again.

I can lose my own money. Must be one hell of a psychological rollercoaster though.
 
Quote from Longhorns:

The total yearly returns are abysmal for that amount of risk (maximum drawdown was almost 72%!!!)

Only way to invest in that fund is to wait for 3 or 4 consecutive losing months, or a 40%-50% drawdown and then jump in.

It only seems that way because of .... survivorship bias :)

ie - those that go on to lose all your money get erased from databases.

Incidentally, David Beach is a fine and very successful manager.
 
Quote from tireg:

What if that 50% dd turns into a 80 or 90% dd? You assume that just b/c he had a nice recovery he can do it again.

Not assuming anything...just saying that THE ONLY WAY I would ever invest in that fund is after a massive drawdown.
 
Back
Top