Who uses Metastock?

Quote from intradaybill:

Then post the results looney. What is holding you back? Maybe a few errors at the end. Or maybe you do not want anyone else to try your two line code? You think people are stupid here?

Go ahead moron and post the last ten trades to 07/06/2012 so everyone can see the problem with your sh*t. You are spending time typing non-sense loony when you could just post the results and the code. You should be ashamed of yourself for what kind of degenerate personality you are.

Again, if you do not post the results, it means the code has problems and that is why you are not posting it.

I have never met anyone as sick and abrassive as you are in these threads. You blew a small point out of proportion and you would not have done that unless that effected you personally. So everyone realizes what is involved here.

Post the code and results or hide away loony. Put your head in the sand and hide away.
More...

So now the real lunatic is coming out of the closet, right? Hahaha
Are you hitting your head against a wall right now? Because it feels like that.

You didn't want to provide your code example but you get crazy as hell that now someone else is doing the same to you. lol There is nothing wrong. The code doesn't have problems. Maybe your code has problems. And that is driving you nuts. Tell me what is wrong in your view and I'll post the code. I have posted a few results right now. You have provided nothing at all since then. Nothing. Why are you that shy with your results. That's the real fishy issue.

BTW regarding your 2 bars idiocy. This is a reply I got from T.J.

Hello,

You need to understand that "barsIntrade" in AmIBroker means
"how many bars did trade span".

1-bar trade is only such trade that opened and closed AT the very same bar.

Any trades that begin on one bar and end on second bar span TWO bars
regardless which price is used.
Price used does not matter.

The program must behave consistently and you can not change the way how
bars are counted based on price. How would you count bars if somebody
wanted to include slippage like this:

BuyPrice = Close + Slippage; ?



Best regards,
Tomasz Janeczko
amibroker.com
More...

An in regards to BarsInTrade object of custom backtest interface
in comparison to #bars column.

Hello,

The value displayed in the report is ONE-based.
All AFL variables, indices, etc are always zero based (this is 'C'-language convention).
For example when there are 200 Bars the bars are indexed starting from 0 and ending at 199.

The same occurs in many places. For example rows are numbered from 1 for display but
from 0 internally.

As documented in the manual.
http://www.amibroker.com/guide/a_custombacktest.html
BarsInTrade
long BarsInTrade

bars spent in trade (counting starts from 0)

If BarsInTrade zero - it means that "the trade is just open" (and report will report 1 in this case).


Best regards,
Tomasz Janeczko
amibroker.com
More...


So Billy boy, just use this CBT code in addition to your code to see that barsintrade outputs 1 in this our case as it starts counting from 0.

Code: 
SetOption("ExtraColumnsLocation", 13 ); 

SetCustomBacktestProc("");        
                                  
if( Status("action") == actionPortfolio )
{
   bo = GetBacktesterObject();
   bo.Backtest(1); 

   // iterate through closed trades 
   for( trade = bo.GetFirstTrade(); trade; trade = bo.GetNextTrade() )
   {  
         bit = trade.barsintrade; 
         trade.AddCustomMetric("BIT", bit);
   }

   bo.ListTrades();
}
 
Why don't you post the code and results as Bill asked to give an end to this? I have Amibroker and I can verify your results if you post the code. Then we can all agree that Bill is wrong.
 
No, I want Bill to participate. He's claimed something without facts. So I kindly asked him but he denied. It's his turn now. I've already provided facts. And additional facts by Tomasz himself.

And you can't be serious that you can not code 5 lines
 
here is another result list and using 1 MSFT share
SetPositionSize( 1, spsShares );

Where is the blow up?

image.png
 
And Billy boy, just FYI, if you want your own #bars column per your rules then simply use the custom backtest interface.

Then in your system that exits at open after previous bar that was entry bar (entry at close) then if your intention is to count that as 0 bar you get a 0 bar column and profit/bit is not executable then because it's division by zero

See BIT and Profit/BIT columns.

image.png


Hahahaha
 
An here it exits not at next bar's open but at open after next
So I guess as per your definition this should be 1 bar in trade.
So here it is.

image.png
 
funnyguy take your juvenile shit elsewhere already.

we're trying to have intelligent debate here on the merits of MS.

+1 for AmiBroker. I jettisoned MS years ago for AB and never looked back.
 
Quote from Tech Analysis:

funnyguy take your juvenile shit elsewhere already.

we're trying to have intelligent debate here on the merits of MS.

+1 for AmiBroker. I jettisoned MS years ago for AB and never looked back.
More...

Yeah Billy boy, another sock puppet account of yours?
We are debating but unfortunately without any results from funnybill that would finish all of that. But he likes to be imprecisely. Billy wanted to see results and fact. So I provided them.

BTW, where is the intelligence in your sentences? I can't find it.
 
Since you still don't get it. No wonder, Tech Analyzers are all slow.

He claimed there were issues so I have asked him privately to present an example. He strangely denied and instead wanted ME to post results in this thread. Then because of his stupidity and inability to precisely describe what he is even looking for the never ending story started. But it seems the quoted words of Tomasz Janeczko have finally silenced is clueless mouth.

And actually I have fun to needle him.
 
OK, good news I stop here but for only one reason that is to not harm Mr. Janeczko. He doesn't deserve it. Peace over and out.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top