Who uses Metastock?

funnyguy · Jul 8, 2012

Quote from intradaybill:

I am glad you have nothing better to do and you are standing by for this.

Now show the last trades to 07/06/2012. Are you afraid of that? Why do you only have a few trades in your report.

Why only few trades, you ask?
Do you have Alzheimers?

Quote from intradaybill yesterday: Post the results here. First 20 trades. Let us see what you get you "expert".

Why should I be afraid. I don't trade crappy systems like you do.

Quote from intradaybill:

FYI, I am not nitpicking you loony. The system is not invested for 2 bars. This is a flaw. I can suspect why you get that.

Suspect what? You having brain difficulties? The header doesn't say invested 2 bars. It counts number of involved bars.

Quote from intradaybill:

By the way loony, what version of Amibroker are you running? Are you willing to provide the code so everyone else here can check that it works and you you have not simply re-arranged the data to get what you get? I hope you won't have any problems with that.

I'm running the most recent one, Hillybilly. I asked you in the first PN to please provide a testing sample. You replied with "No". As your pimp I'm doing the real "No" now. I don't re-arrange data. Since you suspect that my suspicion is that you indeed can not get five lines of code done.

Quote from intradaybill:

If you do not know how to do it, set the number of shares to 1. use:

SetPositionSize( 1,spsShares );

OK you have learned a new line. Fine, Billy boy. Now try the rest of it.

intradaybill · Jul 8, 2012

Quote from funnyguy:

OK you have learned a new line. Fine, Billy boy. Now try the rest of it.

You are the one who started this. So now do not run away. Show the last 10 trades of the system up to 07/06/2012. Also provide the code so everyone else in here can check the results.

Loony, I am not trading this system. You are such retard. I use that system to check for backtesting problems.

If you do not post the last ten trades and the code it means something is fishy here. You smell bad anyway...

funnyguy · Jul 8, 2012

Quote from intradaybill:

You are the one who started this. So now do not run away. Show the last 10 trades of the system up to 07/06/2012. Also provide the code so everyone else in here can check the results.

Loony, I am not trading this system. You are such retard. I use that system to check for backtesting problems.

If you do not post the last ten trades and the code it means something is fishy here. You smell bad anyway...

I'm the one? You really have Alzheimers. You have claimed something and I was interested what's about it and I kindly ask via PN to provide an example about whatever issue you were talking about. Instead you rudely answered no and instead were demanding this and that. So I have complied with it after all. But you, what have you provided since then? Nothing. Now it's your turn. The only one being fishy is you in your dirty shoes. "If you do not post ..." blah blah. What then? Do you free the tiny fish out of your panties then? Whoaa, I'm scared.

intradaybill · Jul 8, 2012

Quote from funnyguy:

I'm the one? You really have Alzheimers. You have claimed something and I was interested what's about it and I kindly ask via PN to provide an example about whatever issue you were talking about. Instead you rudely answered no and instead were demanding this and that. So I have complied with it after all. But you, what have you provided since then? Nothing. Now it's your turn. The only one being fishy is you in your dirty shoes. "If you do not post ..." blah blah. What then? Do you free the tiny fish out of your panties then? Whoaa, I'm scared.

It is PM you moron. Not PN.

Now if you do not post the code and the last 10 trades to 07/06/2012 of the backtest it means there is a problem. Do not hide you loony. You sent me a PM first, which I will disclose here because you are accusing me. I was very nice but you attacked me moron. Here is for the record:

My first answer to your first PM:

Re: your post in "Metastock" thread
Hi,

I remember I was trying to buy at the close and exit at the next open and I had a hard time getting it do it right. When I got it working, the code was correct but the report was wrong.

Bill
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

funnyguy wrote on 07-05-12 02:47 PM:
Hello Bill,

regarding Amibroker you mentioend "This product has minor backtesting issues"

What exactly do you mean?

As evryone can see I am very nice. Then you claim its working nice. This is my reply to the second PM:

No, you send an example where you buy at the close and sell at the open along with data file and trade list. We can then talk. You can post it in the thread. Post the code also. Since you said it's working fine.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Nah, it's working correctly. So far I haven't found a bug in Amibroker yet. Please send the code or a code example. thanks!

Best regards

Then you send another PM in which you become hostile. This is my response where I ask you why you are attacking me:

I did not attack you, neither your abilities. If you have problems, take it some place else.

On the report you set, this is NOT a system that buys at the close of a bar and sells at the next open of next bar. Check your times and DO NOT respond because you will be put on ignore now.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

funnyguy wrote on 07-06-12 04:42 PM:
So here is an example. http://is.gd/u8uYWj
What is wrong?

Me rather thinks you that you seem to have no clue how to code in AFL.

So this is the record in which you show that you are an abrassive character with mental problems. Now post the details or go screw yourself idiot. If you do not post what I asked it means you little code has problems you fudged.

funnyguy · Jul 8, 2012

Nah, it's working correctly. So far I haven't found a bug in Amibroker yet. Please send the code or a code example. thanks!

Best regards

This is hostile? Hahaha

You're calling me moron and at the same time are talking about hostile?

I was asking you to post an example first. You rudely denied. Why??
Makes no sense. On the other side you are demanding stuff from others. I complied nevertheless and provided correct results. Then you are accusing me of faking although you haven't provided anything similar in regards to your claims. Who is the fishy loony?

funnyguy · Jul 8, 2012

Then you send another PM in which you become hostile. This is my response where I ask you why you are attacking me:

funnyguy wrote on 07-06-12 04:42 PM:
So here is an example. http://is.gd/u8uYWj
What is wrong?

Me rather thinks you that you seem to have no clue how to code in AFL.

More...

I did not attack you, neither your abilities. If you have problems, take it some place else.

On the report you set, this is NOT a system that buys at the close of a bar and sells at the next open of next bar. Check your times and DO NOT respond because you will be put on ignore now.

More...

Because you simply have no clue. There was nothing wrong. And I did the first test according to your rules "buys at the close of a bar and sells at the next open of next bar". You having no clue is a fact and you still don't get it that you did not specify your rules precisely. Facts can not be hostile.

funnyguy · Jul 8, 2012

On the report you set, this is NOT a system that buys at the close of a bar and sells at the next open of next bar. Check your times and DO NOT respond because you will be put on ignore now.

Again this simply is nonsense because it's not true and you don't get it.

This is precisely "a system that buys at the close of each bar and sells at the next open of next bar that is the bar after entry bar".

funnyguy · Jul 8, 2012

You've claimed something and can not provide details about what issues you are talking about and are replying "No, I won't give you details". How stupid is that? Then someone else is providing details and facts and all the sudden you claim the results are a mess and fake. lol Who is the lunatic Hillybilly?

intradaybill · Jul 9, 2012

Quote from funnyguy:

You've claimed something and can not provide details about what issues you are talking about and are replying "No, I won't give you details". How stupid is that? Then someone else is providing details and facts and all the sudden you claim the results are a mess and fake. lol Who is the lunatic Hillybilly?

Then post the results looney. What is holding you back? Maybe a few errors at the end. Or maybe you do not want anyone else to try your two line code? You think people are stupid here?

Go ahead moron and post the last ten trades to 07/06/2012 so everyone can see the problem with your sh*t. You are spending time typing non-sense loony when you could just post the results and the code. You should be ashamed of yourself for what kind of degenerate personality you are.

Again, if you do not post the results, it means the code has problems and that is why you are not posting it.

I have never met anyone as sick and abrassive as you are in these threads. You blew a small point out of proportion and you would not have done that unless that effected you personally. So everyone realizes what is involved here.

Post the code and results or hide away loony. Put your head in the sand and hide away.

Humpy · Jul 9, 2012

I bought Version 11 but have to agree Metastock which was once a world leader has been overtaken !
And the cost - horrific or laughable !
It does serve though as an EOD charting package, with the S&P data loaded manually.
I don't bother with realtime data streaming etc - too expensive. The SBs charts are quite adequate and free.
Strange how SBs are banned in the US ! Paid politicians and all that I guess. We call that sort of manipulation - corruption.