I (initially) approached the trading world in a purely scientific way (somehow "blindly"). I collected (using a custom downloader) for long time several terabites of tick data from a list 200 given symbols (i just initially screened the most liquid ones).
Then I defined a general class of trading strategies which include the most common devices and ideas such as:
open (according to trend)
trade (even using pyramiding)
close using trailing take profit
close by stop loss
Then, I run on a few quadcores for several months all the possible strategies (varying the parameters in all possible ways in a Monte Carlo simulation) using all the symbols.
I am describing this quickly, but this was a very painful process.
In short, my results was that over 200 symbols I tried, for *almost* all the symbols there is NOT even 1 strategy belonging to this class which, in the long run, yields a positive average PNL!
I found only a very few (less than 10) symbols which turns out to be actually tradable and with positive avg PNL (actually for some of them the returns are attractive). And, guess what, they are mostly leveraged ETF ...
Why? You experts tell me!
(I did not try the 3x, but I am going to run simulations also for these)
T
Quote from winstontj:
How many members here use ETFs & leveraged ETFs. I see a lot of misinformation floating around everywhere and I'm wondering what the common consensus is on them.
Also wondering more specificlly about the downside or what members dislike about them.
Thanks - hopefully people will discuss.