Who should I ignore?

[NeoTrader]

Then, "ignore Trump"?

Trade tariffs are as socialist as it gets... So, yeah, in that sense, ignoring Trump is being a capitalist...

 

[tomorton]

helpful for what?

after a few posts one can decide for himself who he is dealing with and what to do about this person

but your suggestion is borderline branding the people

actually i would eliminate all likes as well

Well, if you didn't like the ideas of an "Ignores" league table, well, you could Ignore it....

 

[Overnight]

Ok. Due to the abundance of diarrhea on this site, I’ve decided to go on an ignore campaign. Let’s actively post who you feel should be ignored and why. I won’t get offended if I make the list, but would appreciate constructive criticism. In many cases I’ve kindly placed members on ignore for lack of conciseness, but not necessarily poor content.

I tend to have a habit of being ignored by people who eventually get banned. Kind of weird.

But just as weird is you asking others who you should be ignoring outright, without seeing what they are all about. That is like letting others dictate to you what content they feel you should see. And that is self-imposed censorship, no?

I don't ignore people in a generic list. I just watch everyone, and mentally ignore anyone's post I feel needs to be ignored, or disregarded.

Just blanket-ignoring someone can cause you to miss the occasional "aha" nugget of wisdom or bit of information they may post that you did not know about, which can be helpful to you.

 

[vanzandt]

“Great minds discuss ideas, average minds discuss events, and little minds discuss people.”

This quote always comes to mind when I see women watching "The View".

 

[312]

I submit you follow Charlie Munger's "invert, always invert" approach: put everyone on the ignore list, and then un-ignore as necessary.

Now if you'll excuse me, I have some EURUSD to day-trade. I see a promising pattern forming on the chart.

 

[TDMA]

DAMN... you seem to think you're some kind of special to evaluate and judge everybody else. If someone is "not accredited", then they are worthless?

Of course, I'm more experienced than you, and no, only the people in the middle who think they are accredited when they're not are useless, most in the middle are just trying to pay the bills and make it to next week.

Did you make it with success in the markets?

Absolutely, and without the inferiority complex.

Did grandma die and leave it to you?

No, but close enough.

Perhaps you'd be happier on the "Accredited Elite Traders" website...

Excellent, they registered AccreditedPT.com (Accredited Private Traders), very good.

 

[newwurldmn]

I think @sle should be on top of everyone’s ignore list. Him and all that intellectual stuff...

Sle put everyone on ignore, so when he comes here he doesn't see any posts. That's why he doesn't respond to anyone anymore.

 

[312]

Of course, I'm more experienced than you, and no, only the people in the middle who think they are accredited when they're not are useless, most in the middle are just trying to pay the bills and make it to next week.



Absolutely, and without the inferiority complex.



No, but close enough.



Excellent, they registered AccreditedPT.com (Accredited Private Traders), very good.

WTF is an accredited trader? An SEC accredited investor with a cocaine and hookers habit?

 

[Sig]

I think @sle should be on top of everyone’s ignore list. Him and all that intellectual stuff...

Sadly @sle left the forum in January, a significant loss imho.

 

[themickey]

Most users are ignore-worthy. A better use of your time is figuring out which are authentic financial markets professionals.

I tend to select those to go on ignore who are clearly clueless regarding trading and seem to lack the ability to contribute anything positive.
CSEtrader was the latest waste of time loser.