Who rules the charts?

There's no point us arguing over whether the chart is a downtrend or a range. These things are constructs to aid training, not DNA to aid positive forensic identification and prediction.

I don't trade in ranges because I don't have to. Nobody has to. There are always trends to follow and trends have a higher probability of continuation than reversal - that's why they are trends.

Ranges are difficult to find objective definitions for, and they have unclear FA rationale. Range trades rely on repeated reversals, which are inherently a low-probability price behaviour. It is hard to say that the most likely thing that price in a range will do is continue the same range. Its a poor strategy and definitely attractive to new traders.

Im sticking with 30 - 60 cent penny stocks right now and In so far as im new at this i really dont have much interest in anything unless its on the floor and has been (recently) at least 3 times az high as when i buy into it.

If im on the floor its pretty hard to fall down!!!

I made $2800 on my 1st trade (NUGL) and hope to keep that up.
 
downtrend or a range
it is always both....a range may be a trend in a longer time frame

all ranges are pull backs or trend in a longer time frame.

but this is off topic....

i am not sure what the question was...perhaps if it was rephrased......
 
And why would anyone want to do that, when they make more money with every tick the stock goes upwards?
since for a market to exist someone has to take the other side of the transaction [!!!!!!] there is obviously some reason or may be many reasons for somebody to do the low probability trade.
 
or it is always in a trend if you go to the right time frame


That is obvious. I'm not a trader who can use the same TA-based strategy on time-frames that are several times larger or smaller than my standard. So my strategy, trades and trade management are based solely on daily charts. I cannot simply shrink the time-frame to 15-minutes and run the same strategy.
 
Back
Top