It would be interesting to know whether the people behind 'health-desk.org' actually read the papers they reference. For example the Nature article which they cite concludes:
"ADE has been observed in SARS, MERS and other human respiratory virus infections including RSV and measles, which suggests a real risk of ADE for SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and antibody-based interventions. However, clinical data has not yet fully established a role for ADE in human COVID-19 pathology. Steps to reduce the risks of ADE from immunotherapies include the induction or delivery of high doses of potent neutralizing antibodies, rather than lower concentrations of non-neutralizing antibodies that would be more likely to cause ADE.
Going forwards, it will be crucial to evaluate animal and clinical datasets for signs of ADE, and to balance ADE-related safety risks against intervention efficacy if clinical ADE is observed. Ongoing animal and human clinical studies will provide important insights into the mechanisms of ADE in COVID-19. Such evidence is sorely needed to ensure product safety in the large-scale medical interventions that are likely required to reduce the global burden of COVID-19."
This directly contradicts what health-desk are saying in their article and supports what I said, namely that it is still too early to say for sure whether the vaccines cause ADE.
Its very easy to get vaccinated. Its impossible to get unvaccinated. Unless you think you are going to die of covid in the next 2-3 years, it would be folly in my opinion not to wait to see what the long term effects of these vaccines really are before making a final decision.