Things were different 100 years ago.
I think it's time to close America's doors. At least until it get its shit straightened out.
I think it's time to close America's doors. At least until it get its shit straightened out.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Who knows about the Constitutional Party??
- Thread starter jueco2005
- Start date
Quote from swtrader:
at least you chose a glib answer, most people go ad-hominum when confronted with that presentation
You lost me on "liousina purchase" and hanging your entire rep on a YouTube video.
If you want to be taken seriously, then at least clean up your posts and don't treat Youtube as any kind of authority. It is a playground.
Really...
As an immigrant myself I get scare when people like you say things like that. As a US citizen I agree with you. We need to save America from the new people coming in. Immigration is an Asset becoming a liability to this country.
Quote from forextrades:
Things were different 100 years ago.
I think it's time to close America's doors. At least until it get its shit straightened out.
Quote from TraderZones:
You lost me on "liousina purchase" and hanging your entire rep on a YouTube video.
If you want to be taken seriously, then at least clean up your posts and don't treat Youtube as any kind of authority. It is a playground.
Really...
any person cabale of rational thinking would catch the logical fallacy (strawman arguement) of your point
i am not citing youtube as an authority
i am refering to an organization, who has made a factual presentation and it has been distributed on youtube
either address it or ignore it (which of course is your right)
but enough of your bullshit
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Description of Straw Man
The Straw Man fallacy is committed when a person simply ignores a person's actual position and substitutes a distorted, exaggerated or misrepresented version of that position. This sort of "reasoning" has the following pattern:
Person A has position X.
Person B presents position Y (which is a distorted version of X).
Person B attacks position Y.
Therefore X is false/incorrect/flawed.
This sort of "reasoning" is fallacious because attacking a distorted version of a position simply does not constitute an attack on the position itself. One might as well expect an attack on a poor drawing of a person to hurt the person.
http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/straw-man.html
Quote from swtrader:
any person cabale of rational thinking would catch the logical fallacy (strawman arguement) of your point
i am not citing youtube as an authority
i am refering to an organization, who has made a factual presentation and it has been distributed on youtube
either address it or ignore it (which of course is your right)
but enough of your bullshit
ouch - do a spell check before you post - cabale, arguement, refering. It is putting major dents in your argument and in your credibility.
I think I will pass - on the video and on this discussion