The same way that anyone can explain it.
But that neither matters at all nor detracts from my factual points above, because it isn't relevant to this conversation what some companies in other industries do: it has absolutely nothing to do with my point at all, which (as so often) you're wilfully ignoring and just clutching at straws to try to make yourself right, rather than being willing to think about it and learn something.
Your difficulty in understanding this, as equally demonstrated in so many other threads, stems from your fundamental lack of understanding about the differences between genuine brokers and counterparty market-makers, the respective business models of each, where and how their income is derived, what sort of customers they're trying to attract and why (and, in this case, also "how"), and the significance of that to each of us in deciding where and how to trade.
In a sense, the whole underlying issue relates to a common feature of forum conversations about forex trading: there are two hugely different consensuses of opinion on display in forums - one represents the typical views of "struggling retail forex traders" (mostly trading forex with wildly unreasonable expectations because they want to take advantage of the huge leverage offered, as they're undercapitalised for trading in the first place), and the other the typical view of people actually making a living through their trading. The huge disparity of beliefs, attitudes and understanding between these two groups of traders alone might tell you something - but only if you're willing to learn something rather than just trying to "Be Right".
Last edited:
