How could risking 9 to make 1 be more advantageous than risking 8 to make 2???
I asked the OP to clarify and 1:4 is the Reward to Risk,not the other way around..You have it backwards...understandably so,which is why I asked.
More to the point,if you look at his position and see what he's doing,you would know that risk reward of 1:4/1:9 is not possible.Its reward to risk...
Some of his OTM IC's exceed RISK/REWARD of 9:1...
Proceed at your own risk



Well, my apologies.![]()
Thank you very much for the reply. This leaves me with one other question. Do you believe a structure where the ratio is 1:9, is advantageous to a structure with a ratio of 1:4?