C cuz69 Oct 7, 2008 #1 Ok I am not knocking this guy, I know nothing about him. But we have a guy who built the largest telescope in charge of the funds?? Shouldn't he be working for NASA? Not the fed. Does anyone else see something wrong with this picture?
Ok I am not knocking this guy, I know nothing about him. But we have a guy who built the largest telescope in charge of the funds?? Shouldn't he be working for NASA? Not the fed. Does anyone else see something wrong with this picture?
P ProfitTakgFool Oct 7, 2008 #2 He used to work for Goldman Sachs and is one of Paulson's good ole boys.
R runningman Oct 7, 2008 #3 Quote from ProfitTakgFool: He used to work for Goldman Sachs and is one of Paulson's good ole boys. More... He's not "ole" anything-- he's 35. Obviously with decades of experience behind him.
Quote from ProfitTakgFool: He used to work for Goldman Sachs and is one of Paulson's good ole boys. More... He's not "ole" anything-- he's 35. Obviously with decades of experience behind him.
C cuz69 Oct 7, 2008 #4 Quote from ProfitTakgFool: He used to work for Goldman Sachs and is one of Paulson's good ole boys. More... Didn't know that. Heard he developed the telescope and figured he was an MIT, Nasa man.
Quote from ProfitTakgFool: He used to work for Goldman Sachs and is one of Paulson's good ole boys. More... Didn't know that. Heard he developed the telescope and figured he was an MIT, Nasa man.
C cuz69 Oct 7, 2008 #5 Quote from runningman: He's not "ole" anything-- he's 35. Obviously with decades of experience behind him. More... I have to laugh at that one because at 35 I can only assume you are being sarcastic.
Quote from runningman: He's not "ole" anything-- he's 35. Obviously with decades of experience behind him. More... I have to laugh at that one because at 35 I can only assume you are being sarcastic.
