who is still profitable in the forex?

Quote from cabletrader:

That sounds like some kind of immature veiled threat, why on earth would you want my real name, how odd. What are you planning on doing, spamming me to death :D

You're actually quite a strange kind of person aren't you, you live in your own blissfully ignorant little dream world oblivious to reality, I guess it must be quite nice at times.

Internet chat rooms and forums are filled with all sorts of weirdos, you're a classic example, that alone makes the use of pseudonyms a much better idea than giving out personal information, it's just plain common sense and nothing to do with 'cowardice'. On the other hand publishing your real name and personal information is actually pretty stupid, not brave!

Yes calling people names and making false acquisitions while hiding behind a made up name on the internet, very manly of you.
 
Quote from NY0BScalper:

I hate to say it, but my instinct is almost never wrong on these things... smells like a very typical confidence scheme. VERY typical.

No one ever comes out and challenges it because it's in such poor taste, especially if it may well be true, but that's what helps perpetuate the myth. Somehow getting ripped off by someone with huge medical expenses just doesn't feel so bad.

I wonder who to believe: A) a guy hiding behind an anonymous "handle" on the internet, or B) The founder and CEO of a $350million million per year business who was one of the original employee's at Microsoft? My money would be on B), and I'd bet almost anyone else with a brain would put their's in B) too.

I present to you B): Tom Campbell, the founder and CEO of eSnipe, and former high level exec @ microsoft with is opinion of me: "Brandon is the real deal. I have been the CEO of eSnipe.com, a popular auction services site (we'll process about $350 million worth of eBay bids this year) since the last crash. I bought eSnipe.com in 2000 and it's been very profitable since2001. Before that I was in management at Microsoft. I know where to find smart people and Brandon outshines just about all of them. Brandon is at the very edge of the bell curve in brains, but that's just the start. He's a generous,effective communicator who likes nothing more than to help people succeed. He has already given me a bushel full of profitable ideas. Let me put it bluntly: you;re stupid if you have the chance to work with Brandon and you don't. Take his ideas to the bank, because if you don't, your smartest competitors are going too."
 
Quote from Brandonf:

Yes calling people names and making false acquisitions while hiding behind a made up name on the internet, very manly of you.

lol, you're really out there aren't you!

What false 'acquisitions' have I made, do enlighten us :D

And tell me, which bit of this didn't you quite understand...

"Internet chat rooms and forums are filled with all sorts of weirdos, you're a classic example, that alone makes the use of pseudonyms a much better idea than giving out personal information, it's just plain common sense and nothing to do with 'cowardice'. On the other hand publishing your real name and personal information is actually pretty stupid, not brave!"
 
Quote from baron193:

I think he means: accusations
it can be that "false aquisitions" is something he's too familiar with.....:)

lol, good answer!

Freudian slip, how did I miss that one!
 
As I predicted, Brandonf said he was completely and totally done on EliteTrader. I said he would return and wondered how many weeks it would take.

Just shows he needs to continue building his reputation...

Unfortunately Brandon, people now understand what you are about and won't be snowed constantly...
 
Quote from TraderZones:

As I predicted, Brandonf said he was completely and totally done on EliteTrader. I said he would return and wondered how many weeks it would take.

Just shows he needs to continue building his reputation...

Unfortunately Brandon, people now understand what you are about and won't be snowed constantly...

Yes I'm seeing that, my evil plot has been foiled. Since Tim ony made $88,000 last month and we are on track to do over 150K this month I might have to be lining up at the welfare office any day now.
 
Quote from achilles28:

Market structure never changes, brother.

Your system catches high range trends, and loses in range-bound/tight markets. Right?

The market goes up, down and sideways.

Its the amplitude of that movement that kills traders.

When the market consolidates into tighter and tighter ranges, the more long-term trend followers get killed.

When the market contracts, only scalpers profit. By scalper, I mean guys with 10 pip emergency stops, that go for minimum 10 pips, per trade.

Why only scalpers? Because the market trends 85%+ of the time, on lower time frames. What is chop, head-fakes, and whipsaws to long and medium-term traders are pure, clean and exploitable trends to scalpers on the 10/30 second chart.

IMO, market structure can be organized into 9 subsections, according to direction and amplitude. A successful day-trader must be able to exploit at least 7 of these conditions to profit long-term. Why? Because market amplitude expands and contracts. If a trader can't avoid losses in a tight market, they won't make a living at all.

The following description of market structure is from the vantage point of a scalper trading off a 30/10/ or 5 second chart. Where the market trends, they can profit.



1) High range, up markets = trend = profitable

2) Medium range, up markets = trend = profitable

3) Low range, up markets = trend = profitable

4) High range, down markets = trend = profitable

5) Medium range, down markets = trend = profitable

6) Low range, down markets = trend = profitable

7) High range, sideways markets = trend = profitable

8) Medium range, sideways markets = trend = profitable

9) Low range, sideways markets = NOT EASY.

Market conditions most difficult to trade are tight ranges (10-15 pips) on weak-trending/sideways markets where price action is "jumpy" (ie. price quickly jumps 3-5 pips in anticipated direction before a decent signal is generated. Doesn't sound like much, but thats 20-50% of the move, right there!)

This is actually the most difficult incarnation of #9, and happens much more often than one would think.

Monday last week during late New York Session is a good example.

I am still trying to figure out how best to profit from days like this, but its the hardest trading out there. Basically, a trader needs to focus on the higher time frame chart (5 mins) to determine direction and possible entries, than use no latency entry signals (support and resistance) or price action off low latency charts (1 or 2 second). Very little margin of error on these days...

Anyway, from the sounds of it, your system profits during #1, 2, 4 and 5. Its no wonder you're taking heavy losses as the market does #3, 6, 7, 8, and 9, and your system can't exploit those periods.

Basically, you need to change your strategy and learn how to scalp off lower time frames. Then you can profit from 80% of market movement, which will cover the losses from the other 20%. In time, that 20% can be widdled down to 10 or 5%.

Exactly. Great post.

7,8,9 are harder than hell and frustrating at that.

Down markets and up markets are usually never uniform BUT you can usually tell the way the market will fall/go up, by the path it previously took to get there.

That's one of the reasons why I don't trade the same vehicle day after day. On strategy I use (although nothing too earth-shattering)....I go over daily time-frames and look for areas that should have opportunities. Typically stocks and currencies.

The idea here would be to switch markets. Get out of currency all together and trade something else if you need to. There are plenty of things moving. Hell, look for markets trading near highs or lows (this will hopefully steer you clear of choppiness).


The less time spent on the computer the better. Whatever your strategy. If you're daytrading, adjust your "winners" to take advantage of longer time-frames...... That's just one way to do it.
 
Quote from cabletrader:


I'm always cautious of advising people to change time-frames mid trade but I don't think you meant that.

lol perfect. It depends on the result of the trade. I've got a PM for you. I don't entirely agree with this :). You may see it differently though.
 
Quote from athlonmank8:

lol perfect. It depends on the result of the trade. I've got a PM for you. I don't entirely agree with this :). You may see it differently though.

I got it, thanks.

I agree, you can do what you like with a winning trade (as long as it's not allowed to turn into a loser), I was more referring to losing trades.
 
Back
Top