And the woman made the CHOICE to be a catholic, and she made the CHOICE to get in the unhealthy relationship, in the end it is about being repsonsible for your actions. You lay, you pay.
Who is Responsible for Murdering over 40 Million people?
- Thread starter version77
- Start date
And the woman made the CHOICE to be a catholic, and she made the CHOICE to get in the unhealthy relationship, in the end it is about being repsonsible for your actions. You lay, you pay.
Do women in relationships really have a choice when to have sex?
Of course they do. They also have a choice when or not if they
want to use birth control.
I have read that 1% of all abortions are because of rape or incest. I really doubt if it is even that high though.
But, in this case I am all FOR abortion.
Or in the case if the mother is 100% going to die if she has the baby.
How about you telling us in graphic terms how unborn babies
are killed before they get to live a full life like you and me?
And how about an example of how these killed babies are experimented on
like the Nazi's would of done if they were still here, in charge?
Your second paragraph, I agree with.
Ah... lets back up a bit here. You are the one who brought "God"
into this discussion. I was just trying to respond to you using
your "God" (or someone's God?) to try to answer to your post.
From here on, lets just assume we don't know if God exists or not.
So from my standpoint, I am not using any religious dogma in my
discussion about abortion. Leave that to someone else...
Who says I support the accidental killing of innocent civilians? Or
the insurgent's crazy killing of Iraqi civilians and American Soldier's
with their insane roadside bombs, ect.?
That would be like me saying you support Saddam Hussein's murdering
of his own people when he was in power because you and others
like you think it is wrong we brought down his dumb ass.
Hopefully you can crawl out of your mother's womb and understand
what I am saying...
Well, well, well; the ugly truth rears its head.
You arenât going to LET me? You want to disallow me from giving my point of view? You want to control what comes out of my mouth?
You know folks, I really donât need to go any farther than that. That one statement alone solidly makes my point when I say this is an issue of control over someone else. Everything else is just a lame set of excuses for the real enchilada: exerting oneâs will over another.
First of all, just exactly how are you going to accomplish this? You going to edit my posts for me? You going to perform some sort of voodoo?
Second of all, last I checked, I still live in a (fairly) free society and as long as I obey the rules of this forum, I can say whatever I damn well please. AND THEREâS ABSOLUTELY NOTHING YOU CAN DO ABOUT IT.
In the same vein, you can burrow yourself in denial of my statements as deep as you like. However, that just goes further to proving my point.
In order not to detract from the power of the id that was reflected in your faux paux, I am going to let this post stand alone to draw attention to that. I suppose there actually is a little fascism in everyone.
Now that Iâve got that fact out of the way, lets continue to dissect your stupidity.
Like I said before, I used all of the above examples to discredit the logic you use as the primary basis of your position. The fact that you are attempting to evade, rather than rebut, speaks volumes about your hypocritical nature. Yes sir, I am most certainly intelligent enough to know the differences between abortion and all these other issues. What I am flabbergasted about is that you donât appear to be âsmart enoughâ to recognize the similarities.
First of all, I said it was âsimply one example of many reasonsâ. What? This one not good enough for you? You want to hear about the unwanted children that are beaten and battered? You want to hear about babies burned with cigarettes? You want to hear about the ones that are locked away, tortured and starved? Perhaps none of them are as âpreciousâ since theyâve already been born? Perhaps none of their fates are nearly as bad as not being born?
Like I said before; you are assuming that everyone else has the same familial and social support structures that you and your family have. You assume all pregnant women have similar âsafeâ circumstances and environments in their lives that the women in your life have. You assume that forcing unwanted pregnancies to delivery wonât lead to an increase in neglected and tortured children. You assume all unwanted babies will simply be snatched up by the right people and theyâll be loved and properly cared for.
I am not so arrogant as to assume anything. When a pregnant teen tells me her father will beat her, I give her the benefit of the doubt. When a cheating wife impregnated by a lover tells me her husband will kill her, I give her the benefit of the doubt. I am not so arrogant to pass judgement upon a pregnant womanâs choices about her life. I am not so arrogant to assume I know what the best solution is for her problems. However, you seem to be.
By the way: Its doesnât take alcohol for motor vehicle deaths. It doesnât take drugs to exhibit addictive behavior.
So you are denying that all the above examples contain violations to the sanctity of life? Murder, rape, neglect, torture, terror; none of these things infringe on how âpreciousâ life is? So they are âridiculousâ examples of human suffering?
Like I said before, I used all of the above examples to discredit the logic you use as the primary basis of your position. The fact that you are attempting to evade, rather than rebut, speaks volumes about your hypocritical nature. Yes sir, I am most certainly intelligent enough to know the differences between abortion and all these other issues. What I am flabbergasted about is that you donât appear to be âsmart enoughâ to recognize the similarities.
My lesson to teenagers about this subject is: if you use drugs, then you are forfeiting control of your mind. Alcohol is also a drug BTW.
Thatâs an issue of control over a motor vehicle, Einstein.
You donât seem to be smart enough to realize when an enormous portion of your argument is being discredited, so I suppose I shouldnât expect you to recognize sarcasm.
No; I sew up teenagers that get beaten by their fathers and boyfriends (lets throw in husband as well) when they come home pregnant. Damn dude; get it right. I am beginning to realize that you have a serious problem keeping up with your own point of view. However, when all else fails, all you have to do is copy and paste to get mine correct. Its hardly rocket science.
No, comprehension77. Are you getting all flustered with this entire discussion to the point of going blind and forgetful when you read my posts?
First of all, I said it was âsimply one example of many reasonsâ. What? This one not good enough for you? You want to hear about the unwanted children that are beaten and battered? You want to hear about babies burned with cigarettes? You want to hear about the ones that are locked away, tortured and starved? Perhaps none of them are as âpreciousâ since theyâve already been born? Perhaps none of their fates are nearly as bad as not being born?
Like I said before; you are assuming that everyone else has the same familial and social support structures that you and your family have. You assume all pregnant women have similar âsafeâ circumstances and environments in their lives that the women in your life have. You assume that forcing unwanted pregnancies to delivery wonât lead to an increase in neglected and tortured children. You assume all unwanted babies will simply be snatched up by the right people and theyâll be loved and properly cared for.
I am not so arrogant as to assume anything. When a pregnant teen tells me her father will beat her, I give her the benefit of the doubt. When a cheating wife impregnated by a lover tells me her husband will kill her, I give her the benefit of the doubt. I am not so arrogant to pass judgement upon a pregnant womanâs choices about her life. I am not so arrogant to assume I know what the best solution is for her problems. However, you seem to be.
By the way: Its doesnât take alcohol for motor vehicle deaths. It doesnât take drugs to exhibit addictive behavior.