Who is Responsible for Murdering over 40 Million people?

version77 · Feb 25, 2006

Quote from riserburn:

How many have you adopted? How many other "prolifers" out there have adopted kids?

Curious how so many use adoption as an answer to the problem but so few want to participate.

There are plenty of infertile couples who want to adopt. It would
be a lot easier for those who want to adopt if they were not being
aborted first.

With the scarcity of babies to adopt and all the rules they have made
up for adoption it is hard for the average couple to adopt right now.

riserburn · Feb 25, 2006

Quote from version77:

There are plenty of infertile couples who want to adopt. It would
be a lot easier for those who want to adopt if they were not being
aborted first.

With the scarcity of babies to adopt and all the rules they have made
up for adoption it is hard for the average couple to adopt right now.

You still didn't answer the original question.

It doesn't matter how many are available now for adoption. Its a matter of how many are willing to adopt if thats what you want as the answer to the problem.

However, if you must know; I believe that most adoption websites are reporting approximately 120,000 children in the US that are available for adoption.

TheConMan · Feb 25, 2006

The question posed was: How many unwanted children have *YOU* and prolife hypocrites like you, adopted.

There has to be a middle ground that everyone has to agree on. I do not think that the moment the sperm hits the egg, the next day there is a child. Within the first trimester, a woman should be allowed to abort an unwanted fetus. Only a lunatic religious fundamentalist would suggest that a zygote is a baby. These are the lunatics who suggest that the earth is flat and 6000 years old.

Quote from version77:

There are plenty of infertile couples who want to adopt. It would
be a lot easier for those who want to adopt if they were not being
aborted first.

With the scarcity of babies to adopt and all the rules they have made
up for adoption it is hard for the average couple to adopt right now.

dougcs · Feb 25, 2006

Quote from version77:

If they hadn't been killed first, they all would of had what you mention above...

They never had a chance did they?...

Are you in favor of what was going on pre RvW; back alley procedures with coat hangers that cost the lifes of many young women?

DS

dis · Feb 25, 2006

Quote from dddooo:

Can you give me the first name and social security number of at least one of those 40 mln victims? Fingerprints, pictures, dental records, retina scan, hair, any eyewitnesses who ever saw the victim. Anything to prove that the person did exist and the crime was committed.

Or, as Stalin put it: "No man, no problem."

dddooo · Feb 25, 2006

Quote from sputdr:

Ever hear of a sonogram? How about an ultrasound?

Do they count as pictures? Isn't that a record of the child's existance?

Yeah, sonograms do count as pictures, since when pictures count as live humans? You can take a picture of a rock, you can take an x-ray of your brain - in both cases you'll have pictures of completely dead objects.

Do fetuses breath, eat, think, make sounds, cry, have emotions, ask for a raise, move on their own? Jeez. I know you compare them to yourself, fetuses don't think and you don't have a brain either. That's pretty much where the similarities end, it pains me to admit but you're a person, a fetus is still a fetus.

version77 · Feb 26, 2006

Quote from dddooo:

a fetus is still a fetus.

You were once a fetus. IF a fetus is left alone (which is natural by
the way) and not killed it WILL become a human being. Hard to
stomach but ALL fetus's become human beings unless killed first.
Or there is a spontaneous abortion or stillborn death.

Taking life out of a woman's womb and killing it is not natural.

It is 'frickin Barbaric.

If a woman does not want a baby she shouldn't be having sex in
the first place.

And don't tell me women do not feel any guilt after having abortions.

They do. If not, then they do not have a concious. Or they are
on drugs or maybe even perhaps sociopathic.

HOW WOULD YOU OF LIKED TO BE AN ABORTED FETUS?

version77 · Feb 26, 2006

Quote from dougcs:

Are you in favor of what was going on pre RvW; back alley procedures with coat hangers that cost the lifes of many young women?

If a woman wants to make the decision to put a hanger up her
baby maker and kill it and it harms herself then fine.

Maybe it's nature's way of telling her she is trying to commit murder.

sputdr · Feb 26, 2006

Quote from dddooo:

Yeah, sonograms do count as pictures, since when pictures count as live humans? You can take a picture of a rock, you can take an x-ray of your brain - in both cases you'll have pictures of completely dead objects.

Do fetuses breath, eat, think, make sounds, cry, have emotions, ask for a raise, move on their own? Jeez. I know you compare them to yourself, fetuses don't think and you don't have a brain either. That's pretty much where the similarities end, it pains me to admit but you're a person, a fetus is still a fetus.

You are the one that asked if anyone has every seen them and with a sonogram people have seen them right?

yes, fetesus do eat, have brainwaves, kick, move, have developed (not fully) brains much like yours.

Have you ever heard of baby forn malnurished? born with braindamage? A child kicking in their mothers stomach?

Have you ever seen what a partial birth abortion does?

You are frighteneingly ignorant on the subject.

Rearden Metal · Feb 26, 2006

Seriously now, I'm surprised to see so many conservatives here who actually seem to want the gov't to outlaw abortion.

Wouldn't a more logical stance for you, be something like: "Abortion is an immoral act, a sin against God and all that- but still, it is not the proper role of gov't to intervene"?