Who Funds the Far Left? You’ll Be Surprised

Quote from futurecurrents:

You just love showing everyone how stupid you are, don't you?

I don't believe in Santa Claus, the Easter Bunny, or the Tooth Fairy either. All are not real - just like man-made global warming is a fairy tale.
 
Quote from blah12345678:

It's not the issue I have a problem with. It's your irrational zealotry - the over-the-top "I'm right, you're wrong" belligerence that annoys me and tunes me out.

Alarmism is just that - alarmism. No sane person takes alarmism seriously.

Personally, I believe you focus on the short-term symptoms and by-products as the cause of a what we'll soon learn is a trivially irrelevant issue. Some time this century, after the current breed of GW alarmists die off, we'll see a revival of the "Global Cooling" alarmism prevalent in the 1970's.

This focus on short-term symptoms is another reason why everybody else jumps all over you. You can neither prove nor disprove your reasoning, as the world is much older, much, much, much more complex than you make it out to be, and much more resilient than the GW alarmists realize.

Correlation != causation. Basic scientific/statistical principle.

In the grand scheme of things, a meteorite will wipe us out before anything else. This planet has the means to adapt to all kinds of stress, and in light of what it has experienced in the last 4.5 Billion years, this is the equivalent of swatting a fly. Insignificant and irrelevant.

Where should we send the gifts?


You must be a Republican, or even worse, a Libtardarian. Or just plain ignorant about AGW.

Tell me. Are these guys alarmists in your opinion?....

American Physical Society

"The evidence is incontrovertible: Global warming is occurring. If no mitigating actions are taken, significant disruptions in the Earth’s physical and ecological systems, social systems, security and human health are likely to occur. We must reduce emissions of greenhouse gases beginning now."

How about these nutjobs?

American Chemical Society

"Comprehensive scientific assessments of our current and potential future climates clearly indicate that climate change is real, largely attributable to emissions from human activities, and potentially a very serious problem."


I'm just trying to get an idea of what is considered alarmism. We don't want to alarm anyone. Heaven forbid.
 
Quote from gwb-trading:

I don't believe in Santa Claus, the Easter Bunny, or the Tooth Fairy either. All are not real - just like man-made global warming is a fairy tale.

So CO2 is not a greenhouse gas in your world?
 
Quote from futurecurrents:

So CO2 is not a greenhouse gas in your world?

Unlike you, I recognize that CO2 generated by man is not causing global warming. There is no reasonable scientific data to support AGW which at this point is a political agenda.
 
Quote from gwb-trading:

Unlike you, I recognize that CO2 generated by man is not causing global warming. There is no reasonable scientific data to support AGW which at this point is a political agenda.

So the CO2 produced by man is not a greenhouse gas?
 
Quote from gwb-trading:

Who Funds the Far Left? You’ll Be Surprised

Doesnt really surprise me, the left has always been the most degenerate group of hypocrites on planet earth, just look at this skid mark futurecurrents.
 
Quote from Max E. Pad:

Doesnt really surprise me, the left has always been the most degenerate group of hypocrites on planet earth, just look at this skid mark futurecurrents.

Just curious, but does anyone else besides Ricter think that futurecurrents isn't a total tool? Every thread has someone stomping on him.
 
Quote from gwb-trading:

Unlike you, I recognize that CO2 generated by man is not causing global warming. There is no reasonable scientific data to support AGW which at this point is a political agenda.


GWB,, you haven't answered me. Is the CO2 produced by man NOT a greenhouse gas? Because regular CO2 is responsible for at least 20% of earth's greenhouse effect and we have raised it's levels by 40%. Excuse me but I'm trying to figure out how that could NOT lead to higher temps. Thank you.
 
The Center for American Progress was founded by former Clinton chief of staff John Podesta. Podesta is a long time DC behind the scenes guy, working on the Hill for various dems. he and his brother Tony started a high profile lobbying firm.

I suspect many of the companies listed in the OP are lobbying clients. What happens is these companies hire former Hill people as their Washignotn reps. Usually they are dems. Republicans have been effectively tarnished by the media as "too controversial." Their Washington reps advise thme which lobbyists to hire, so naturally they hire dems. Then they are encourage to donate dmoney to causes to promote their good corporate character. Of course, most of the money goes to far left groups. Sometimes the CEO has a particular interest or his wife does, so they direct some fo the money.

If they donate or support conservative groups, the leftwing hate machine goes into attack mode, and they wull be on the receiving end of angry editorials, boycotss, etc. So of course, their liberal washington reps advise them to steer clear of anything "controversial", ie conservative. Even groups like NASCAR fall into this trap. Recall the controversy this summer when a race was sponsored by the NRA, surely a very popular group among stock car racing fans?

This whole double standard was one of the reasons former republican representative Tom DeLay was so unpopular. He started something called the K Street Project. It was basically an affirmative action program for republican staffers. DeLay forced lobbying firms, ie K Street, to hire republicans as well as democrats if they wanted to lobby republicans in the House.
 
Quote from Tsing Tao:

Just curious, but does anyone else besides Ricter think that futurecurrents isn't a total tool? Every thread has someone stomping on him.
Ad hominem, and ad populum?
 
Back
Top