So they came out today saying the Wuhan lab is innoncent and extremely unlikely to be the origin of the virus. Nice to know.
Counter argument:
"The WHO also investigated the 1977 Russian Flu, and concluded that
Laboratory contamination can be excluded because the laboratories concerned either had never kept H1N1 virus or had not worked with it for a long time.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2395678/pdf/bullwho00443-0095.pdf
But later studies showed that the virus was near-identical to a strain from 1950, without the expected mutations that should have occurred if the virus had been circulating undetected in a human or animal host for 20-30 years. Back before lab escapes were a polarizing political topic, the scientific consensus was sufficiently in favor of a lab origin that the NEJM--which has the highest impact factor of any medical journal--casually wrote:
The reemergence was probably an accidental release from a laboratory source in the setting of waning population immunity to H1 and N1 antigens
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMra0904322
So it's funny to see people claiming there's no precedent for a lab accident to start a pandemic. Not only is there a likely precedent for that, but there's also a precedent for the WHO to exclude the possibility at the time."
"On top of that we already know that WHO isn't making adequate assessments as they have said that there was no evidence the virus was spreading before December 2019. We have concrete evidence that people were being diagnosed prior to that. There are US satellite images showing that hospital capacity was increasing from late Summer in Wuhan.
This is literally a slap in the face to an independent investigation its insane.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-52975934"
Counter argument:
"The WHO also investigated the 1977 Russian Flu, and concluded that
Laboratory contamination can be excluded because the laboratories concerned either had never kept H1N1 virus or had not worked with it for a long time.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2395678/pdf/bullwho00443-0095.pdf
But later studies showed that the virus was near-identical to a strain from 1950, without the expected mutations that should have occurred if the virus had been circulating undetected in a human or animal host for 20-30 years. Back before lab escapes were a polarizing political topic, the scientific consensus was sufficiently in favor of a lab origin that the NEJM--which has the highest impact factor of any medical journal--casually wrote:
The reemergence was probably an accidental release from a laboratory source in the setting of waning population immunity to H1 and N1 antigens
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMra0904322
So it's funny to see people claiming there's no precedent for a lab accident to start a pandemic. Not only is there a likely precedent for that, but there's also a precedent for the WHO to exclude the possibility at the time."
"On top of that we already know that WHO isn't making adequate assessments as they have said that there was no evidence the virus was spreading before December 2019. We have concrete evidence that people were being diagnosed prior to that. There are US satellite images showing that hospital capacity was increasing from late Summer in Wuhan.
This is literally a slap in the face to an independent investigation its insane.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-52975934"
Last edited:

