So, how often does Fox News challenge republican liars?
LOL.....
LOL.....
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Who are more convincing liars, Repubs or Dems?
- Thread starter ZZZzzzzzzz
- Start date
Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:
They don't need to?
What part of fair and balanced doesn't challenge lying on both sides?
Too funny....
Fair and balanced meaning they will have people from both sides of the aisle for a debate.
What simple minded people don't understand is that Fox during the prime time hours are OPINION shows not OBJECTIVE REPORTING. See O'rielly and Hannnity analyze the news and present their OPINION about it where as NBC, CBS, ABC and newspapers like the NY Times are supposed to be OBJECTIVE but they are not.
That's the difference that lefties just can't seem to comprehend.
So which republican liars has Fox News spent lots of time on?
Quote from sputdr:
Fair and balanced meaning they will have people from both sides of the aisle for a debate.
What simple minded people don't understand is that Fox during the prime time hours are OPINION shows not OBJECTIVE REPORTING. See O'rielly and Hannnity analyze the news and present their OPINION about it where as NBC, CBS, ABC and newspapers like the NY Times are supposed to be OBJECTIVE but they are not.
That's the difference that lefties just can't seem to comprehend.
Quote from dddooo:
The part about dropping additional charges. But you clarified that already, for the good of the country republicans wanted to impeach him and throw him out of the oval office...but only on reduced charges. As always your posts and your explanations make perfect logical sense.
Ok, let's try a different tack...
Republicans were ina majority in the Senate when it went to vote.
They didn't vote him out.
If they 'wanted' him out, why didn't they vote him out at that time ?
Take a civics class. A simple majority is not enough to impeach in the Senate.
The repubs never had enough votes, that's what made the whole thing stupid, as they knew they couldn't impeach in the Senate, even if they did win in the House.
Genuine waste of money, knowing you can't win, but doing it anyway, right?
Isn't that the point of view of the repubs toward the dems these days?
The repubs never had enough votes, that's what made the whole thing stupid, as they knew they couldn't impeach in the Senate, even if they did win in the House.
Genuine waste of money, knowing you can't win, but doing it anyway, right?
Isn't that the point of view of the repubs toward the dems these days?
Quote from Haroki:
Ok, let's try a different tack...
Republicans were ina majority in the Senate when it went to vote.
They didn't vote him out.
If they 'wanted' him out, why didn't they vote him out at that time ?