White Thugs

[dbphoenix]

Hey dumb fuck .. since the trading day is done I just took you off ignore for a few minutes.

No asshole .. it's not 'like a certain segment of the population believes it to be'. The FACTS are that blacks do commit a very disproportionate amount of crime. FACTS idiot .. deal with them. Wanna make a wager here?

Sorry to burst your bubble .. I rarely watch any TV. And FoxNews is not a channel I watch .. couldn't even tell you what channel it is on U-Verse.

Once again, when you have no FACTS to refute my points you resort to false accusations and innuendo that have more holes in them than swiss cheese.

Go read some of your fruitcake authors articles .. I'm sure you'll come back and say Michael Brown was actually going to the library to study when he was shot and that he had just come from choir practice.

Don't get excited though ... you're back on Ignore. Your drivel is less intelligent than the most uneducated 4th grade kid I worked with last year. Have you ever been institutionalized?

TV? Please. FoxNews also has a presence on the internet, in case you hadn't heard. And the FACTS you like to quote invariably originate there, like that nonsense about ISIS jihadists invading Texas. In fact, every supporting "source" you quoted reiterated the same FoxNews feed.

DickHead. I like that. It suits.

 

[dbphoenix]

The problem with douche bag and Ricter is they have no real world experiences in this area. And douche bag suggesting I'm racist shows how ignorant he is. For if I were then I sure as hell wouldn't have spent probably 5000 hours of my time over 13 years .. given away at no cost .. to high poverty kids, mostly black.

While I put in 20 years. Full-time. Though I was paid.

 

[dbphoenix]

To quote a certain prolific poster, "source?"

It is well established that being a single mother is a ticket to poverty for the vast majority. Of course, there are exceptions, like some celebrities who popularize the idea that it is a good plan. It's not.

Having a father in the house is alos correlated with better outcomes for the kids. This is difficult for liberals to accept because their view is that any non-gay man is only going to engage in domestic abuse, child abuse or perhaps start shooting people.

I already gave it to your group. You didn't like it because 2011 was "too old".

But if you have a more current study, something done since 2011, that shows that the number of parents in the household are the determining factor in educational success, I'd love to review it.

 

[der_kommissar]

While I put in 20 years. Full-time. Though I was paid.

20 years institutionalized?

 

[Max E.]

One might think so, but the research suggests otherwise.

So the research you have looked at shows that growing up in a single parent household has nothing to do with poverty levels? Are you serious? I find it unbelievable that someone could come to this conclusion, by the most basic math 2 people with an income is better than 1, thats a fact that cant even be disputed, unless you believe that all these young single mothers in the hood are doctors and lawyers, lol.

 

[dbphoenix]

So the research you have looked at shows that growing up in a single parent household has nothing to do with poverty levels? Are you serious? I find it unbelievable that someone could come to this conclusion, by the most basic math 2 people with an income is better than 1, thats a fact that cant even be disputed, unless you believe that all these young single mothers in the hood are doctors and lawyers, lol.

You'll have to take that up with Stanford University and the US Dept of Education.

 

[Max E.]

hahahahaha you are such a joke DBgarland, I would love for you to show me a study showing that single parenthood has no effect on income, please show me this nonsense.

 

[Max E.]

I cant even believe that your stupidity has caused me to post this, but here is the census data, on how much people make in fmily, vs single parent households. You really are a decrepit human being for denying something that is so obvious. I suspect however that you are just trolling like you usually do dbgarland.


Households are often divided into quintiles according to their gross income. Each quintile represents 20%, or one fifth, of all households.

Household type is strongly correlated with household income. Married couples are disproportionately represented in the upper two quintiles, compared to the general population of households. Cross-referencing shows that this is likely due to the presence of multiple income earners in these families. Non-family households (individuals) are disproportionately represented in the lower two quintiles. Households headed by single males are disproportionately found in the middle three quintiles; single females head households concentrated in the bottom three quintiles.

The highest income households are almost ten times as likely to own their homes rather than rent, but in the lowest quintile, the ratio of owners to renters is nearly one to one.

The New York Times has used the quintiles to define class. It has assigned the quintiles from lowest to highest as bottom fifth, lower middle, middle, upper middle, and top fifth.[63]

 

[dbphoenix]

I cant even believe that your stupidity has caused me to post this, but here is the census data, on how much people make in fmily, vs single parent households. You really are a decrepit human being for denying something that is so obvious. I suspect however that you are just trolling like you usually do dbgarland.


Households are often divided into quintiles according to their gross income. Each quintile represents 20%, or one fifth, of all households.

Household type is strongly correlated with household income. Married couples are disproportionately represented in the upper two quintiles, compared to the general population of households. Cross-referencing shows that this is likely due to the presence of multiple income earners in these families. Non-family households (individuals) are disproportionately represented in the lower two quintiles. Households headed by single males are disproportionately found in the middle three quintiles; single females head households concentrated in the bottom three quintiles.

The highest income households are almost ten times as likely to own their homes rather than rent, but in the lowest quintile, the ratio of owners to renters is nearly one to one.

The New York Times has used the quintiles to define class. It has assigned the quintiles from lowest to highest as bottom fifth, lower middle, middle, upper middle, and top fifth.[63]



View attachment 145777

Since you've managed to take such a torturous detour, I'll repeat: educational achievement has more to do with poverty level than with whether or not the family is single-parent. Nowhere did I claim that poverty levels and whether or not the family is single-parent are unrelated.

 

[Max E.]

Since you've managed to take such a torturous detour, I'll repeat: educational achievement has more to do with poverty level than with whether or not the family is single-parent. Nowhere did I claim that poverty levels and whether or not the family is single-parent are unrelated.

So now that its been proven (much to your dismay) that a person in a single parent household makes much less money would you not also agree that a kid in a single parent household has less time with an adult teaching them? Once again you are dealing with common sense numbers, hopefully i dont actually have to post them, but for your sake, i will point out 2 parents = twice as much teaching time growing up, and two is greater than 1.

Plus the lower the income of the persons family the lower the odds of them going to school, so by default, single moms who make less will have less kids who go to school.

Now i want you to post this stanford study you have been talking about that supposedly suggests that the number of parents in a household has no effect on household income.