The idiocy is still yours. Nobody official questioned the sentencing of Marky Mark at the time it was imposed. Nobody claimed the victims weren't actual victims nor that a robbery didn't take place. In this Dallas case, things are so much murkier even the first judge questioned the honesty of the alleged victim.
Apples and oranges, idiot.
.... Really?? Its murky when the defendant pleads guilty?? Are you stupid?
In the case in Dallas the guy pled guilty, he didnt have to claim that his problems didnt happen because he owned up to it.
