White House Directed Incorrect Benghazi Narrative

[futurecurrents]

I call him pathetic because of the way he responds to my posts, which I doubt he even fully reads. He is a master at twisting, re-interpreting, and adding commentary unrelated to the post...time and again. I'm sure he doesn't need you to defend him. His introducing birthers into the post was the reason I called him pathetic, and now you have essentially done the same thing with my post to him. You left wingers use the same tired tactics all the time, don't you? Or do you guys just not comprehend what you read?


I'm actually thinking about the evidence that JW presented regarding emails which was enough to cause the procrastinators to actually form a committee, which the left immediately called a witch hunt. He believes this administration is honest when they are proven liars and neck deep in scandals. He is not willing to even consider that his side is lying. I am. It goes beyond believing one side or the other. That is a huge difference. Believe it or not, I know when my side is full of shit, and there is no shortage of it, but the left lies nonstop, and it's proven time after time.

And yet there is STILL no evidence that anyone lied. Amazing.

 

[wjk]

And yet there is STILL no evidence that anyone lied. Amazing.

Isn't that what the committee is being formed to determine? Isn't that what the whole debate is about? The left doesn't seem to want to know if there is evidence of a cover up, does it? We won't ever know if there is not an independent investigation, will we?

My debate with you is about further investigation to make that determination. You don't think it necessary, I do.

"The Judicial Watch president said the newly released emails bring the controversy “into the White House, and it shows that the idea that the CIA created the talking points that Susan Rice was using is a big fat lie.”

My understanding is that the e mail was not released voluntarily.

 

[futurecurrents]

Isn't that what the committee is being formed to determine? Isn't that what the whole debate is about? The left doesn't seem to want to know if there is evidence of a cover up, does it? We won't ever know if there is not an independent investigation, will we?

My debate with you is about further investigation to make that determination. You don't think it necessary, I do.

"The Judicial Watch president said the newly released emails bring the controversy “into the White House, and it shows that the idea that the CIA created the talking points that Susan Rice was using is a big fat lie.”

My understanding is that the e mail was not released voluntarily.

But listening to the right, one would think there was already ironclad proof that Clinton and Obama lied, refused to help as the attack occurred, saw that it would definitely happen and did nothing and slept through the emergency phone call. None of that is true..

Or maybe its just Faux News, jem and Leap saying that.

 

[wjk]

But listening to the right, one would think there was already ironclad proof that Clinton and Obama lied, refused to help as the attack occurred, saw that it would definitely happen and did nothing and slept through the emergency phone call. None of that is true..

Or maybe its just Faux News, jem and Leap saying that.

Hopefully all the relevant docs will be released by the WH. If so, I'm willing to accept the determination of the committee, are you?

 

[Spike Trader]

Hopefully all the relevant docs will be released by the WH. If so, I'm willing to accept the determination of the committee, are you?

House Stacks Deck With GOP Reps...

House Republicans have decided the select committee to investigate the Benghazi terror attack will include seven Republicans and five Democrats, according to two senior House GOP leadership aides.


In the email, the NRCC linked to a contribution page that alerted those who clicked through that they were "now a Benghazi Watchdog" and asked them for donations ranging between $25 and $500

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/05/07/trey-gowdy-benghazi_n_5280492.html

 

[Trader666]

House Stacks Deck With GOP Reps...

Let the leftist attempts to discredit the select committee begin

 

[Tsing Tao]

Let the leftist attempts to discredit the select committee begin

Let the leftists also ignore that they were offered and asked to be a part of this process, but deemed it a "witch hunt" instead of taking part and proving there was nothing to hide.

 

[bigarrow]

I call him pathetic because of the way he responds to my posts, which I doubt he even fully reads. He is a master at twisting, re-interpreting, and adding commentary unrelated to the post...time and again. I'm sure he doesn't need you to defend him. His introducing birthers into the post was the reason I called him pathetic, and now you have essentially done the same thing with my post to him. You left wingers use the same tired tactics all the time, don't you? Or do you guys just not comprehend what you read?


I'm actually thinking about the evidence that JW presented regarding emails which was enough to cause the procrastinators to actually form a committee, which the left immediately called a witch hunt. He believes this administration is honest when they are proven liars and neck deep in scandals. He is not willing to even consider that his side is lying. I am. It goes beyond believing one side or the other. That is a huge difference. Believe it or not, I know when my side is full of shit, and there is no shortage of it, but the left lies nonstop, and it's proven time after time.

Just because I have common sense does not make me a left winger.

 

[wjk]

Just because I have common sense does not make me a left winger.

Fair enough. Having common sense is more likely to indicate you are not a left winger, but you obviously misunderstood my reason for using the term I did, a common occurrence with left wingers. You'll have to excuse my mistake.

To return the thread to it's intent, I'll ask you the same question I asked him, for which I didn't get a response:

Hopefully all the relevant docs will be released by the WH. If so, I'm willing to accept the determination of the committee, are you?

 

[wjk]

The CIA said it was due to the video. You may have heard of them?

"The CIA talking points — which have received endless scrutiny — never even mentioned the Internet video. Indeed, former Deputy CIA Director Mike Morell confessed to being surprised when he saw Rice blame the Benghazi attack on the video. He later told Congress "that’s not something the [CIA] analysts have attributed the attack to."

According to Morell, he didn’t even know that Rice was going on TV and he didn’t know if she even received the "talking points."
Morell knew it wasn’t about the video and he also knew there had been no protest, either. Just hours after the CIA sent its "talking points" memo to Congressman Rogers on Sept. 15, 2012, the CIA Libyan station chief reported that there had been no ground demonstrations. Morel reported this information to Denis McDonough, Obama’s National Security Adviser (the CIA didn’t bother to correct their own talking points)."