White House Directed Incorrect Benghazi Narrative

[Trader666]

Lara Logan: 6 Big Revelations From New York Magazine's Expose
https://tv.yahoo.com/news/lara-logan-6-big-revelations-york-magazines-expose-050000868.html

I won't hold my breath waiting for an expose of the story itself (Benghazi), let alone the demonization of the libturds who wrote the bogus NYT "investigation."

 

[futurecurrents]

Lets see where the intelligence came from in the CIA. Because it looks like some desk made the video up contrary to the intelligence they were receiving.
And even then... I am not sure they did not get the video idea from Clinton herself.

So link us to the proof the CIA told Hillary about the demonstrations in cairo... but lets also find out where the video idea came from.
remember they were anticipating attacks in cairo.

finally, how did an idea about a demonstration get into talking points... when there was no demonstration in benghazi before the attack.

In short... it looks like there was no demonstration and the video idea may have been dreamed up by Clinton as cover.

The CIA

No she's not.

No she did not.


Wow you (and your right wing moron friends here) are confused and delusional.


Trying to make something out of nothing. Pathetic witch hunt by the information challenged wingnuts.

 

[Trader666]

The CIA

No she's not.

No she did not.


Wow you (and your right wing moron friends here) are confused and delusional.


Trying to make something out of nothing. Pathetic witch hunt by the information challenged wingnuts.

Did you get that from Baghdad Bob Carney? You libturds have gone completely off the rails.

 

[jem]

I noticed the other night on fox when Lanny Davis was trying to answer questions without lying.

He made a very telling lawyered up move. He made a statement about Cairo and then said something about sure you are not questioning the idea the video caused problems in Cairo... or something to that effect.

Most likely it had very little to do with the cairo protests so it would have had nothing to do with benghazi.

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/348125/blame-it-video-was-fraud-cairo-rioting-too

 

[Trader666]

More Fireworks: Carney Indicates White House May Not Cooperate With Special Benghazi Investigation
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/201...ooperate-with-special-benghazi-investigation/

 

[Lucrum]

The CIA

...Trying to make something out of nothing....

The "Big Bang" of Benghazi?

More Fireworks: Carney Indicates White House May Not Cooperate With Special Benghazi Investigation

Why would he, he hasn't cooperated with congress since the 2010 midterms.

 

[futurecurrents]

blah blah blah. Amazing the things that get you right wingnuts all excited.

American embassies have been attacked numerous times since 1958. And for the GOP to make a witch hunt out of this one, for some reason, is obviously political in nature. But you will never just admit that. You would rather snipe from sidelines while others bring up the important points.

Some 44 attacks in just over 50 years, or 52 years since 1958 to be more precise, thus reinforce the common belief that life has never been easy for American diplomats posted in foreign countries. In Pakistan, the American diplomatic facilities have now been attacked five times — probably more than any other country in this context — meaning thereby that on an average, the US embassy or consulates have come under attack once every seventh year in this Islamic Republic since November 21, 1979.

While the US embassies and consulates remained the most frequently-targeted international foreign missions during this 52-year period under review, over a dozen of these attacks were recorded during former President George W. Bush’s tenure — the most during the rule of any president in the world super power’s history. Here follows the list of 44 attacks, according to information extracted from various sources including the US Naval History and Heritage, CNN, The New York Times, The Washington Post and Al-Jazeera TV etc:

http://www.thenews.com.pk/Toda...44-times-in-52-years

 

[wjk]

blah blah blah. Amazing the things that get you right wingnuts all excited.

American embassies have been attacked numerous times since 1958. And for the GOP to make a witch hunt out of this one, for some reason, is obviously political in nature. But you will never just admit that. You would rather snipe from sidelines while others bring up the important points.

Some 44 attacks in just over 50 years, or 52 years since 1958 to be more precise, thus reinforce the common belief that life has never been easy for American diplomats posted in foreign countries. In Pakistan, the American diplomatic facilities have now been attacked five times — probably more than any other country in this context — meaning thereby that on an average, the US embassy or consulates have come under attack once every seventh year in this Islamic Republic since November 21, 1979.

While the US embassies and consulates remained the most frequently-targeted international foreign missions during this 52-year period under review, over a dozen of these attacks were recorded during former President George W. Bush’s tenure — the most during the rule of any president in the world super power’s history. Here follows the list of 44 attacks, according to information extracted from various sources including the US Naval History and Heritage, CNN, The New York Times, The Washington Post and Al-Jazeera TV etc:

http://www.thenews.com.pk/Toda...44-times-in-52-years

And which of those attacks did the admin send out a top official to knowingly lie about the cause? Not only did this admin lie, they punished a scapegoat who had nothing to do with what happened.

You are a drone of the highest order. I'm beginning to think you aren't really a brainwashed useful idiot, but are in here to stir shit up. No one your age can be so stupid to think the likes of Hillary and the rest or your progressive loser politicians speak only the truth. How much you making? You're really a well paid conservative, aren't you? Come on, you can tell us.

 

[futurecurrents]

And which of those attacks did the admin send out a top official to knowingly lie about the cause? Not only did this admin lie, they punished a scapegoat who had nothing to do with what happened.

You are a drone of the highest order. I'm beginning to think you aren't really a brainwashed useful idiot, but are in here to stir shit up. No one your age can be so stupid to think the likes of Hillary and the rest or your progressive loser politicians speak only the truth. How much you making? You're really a well paid conservative, aren't you? Come on, you can tell us.

But they did not lie. No matter how many times you idiot righties repeat it. The CIA said it was due to the video. You may have heard of them?

 

[wjk]

But they did not lie. No matter how many times you idiot righties repeat it. The CIA said it was due to the video. You may have heard of them?

I hear a lot of shit come down from on high. The diff between you and me is I don't believe any of it, unless it's presented in a way that indicates that it is NOT a talking point. That means researching many sites. That's a major difference between a free thinker and a useful idiot who believes everything he's spoon-fed..

If you really are this far gone, people like you must make the politicians you support high five each other until their hands are raw.