Yeah, interesting subject indeed.Buffett on Gold:
"If you panicked at the prospects of runaway deficits and a worthless currency" and bought 3.25 ounces of gold with your $114.75. it would be worth about $4,200, or "less than 1% of what would have been realized from a simple unmanaged investment in American business."
"The magical metal was no match for the American mettle."
"In other words, for every dollar you could have made in American business, you'd have less than a penny of gain by buying into a store of value which people tell you to run to every time you get scared by the headlines,"
“(Gold) gets dug out of the ground in Africa, or someplace. Then we melt it down, dig another hole, bury it again and pay people to stand around guarding it."
The Oracle really hates Gold...but loves gold mining stocks? What gives?
My experience, I only trade gold stocks, not physical gold price, and really it's only a short fleeting window of opportunity, in the past I've struggled with it, but on the ASX there is such a huge number of them, it makes for temptation.
Buffett, I'm no fan of him, choosing Barrick to buy would be due to its large cap, not because it was the best performer among all gold stocks.
But the gold stocks outperform the price of gold nearly every single time.
Here's 5 year chart, XAUUSD vs GOLD (Barrack stock symbol [in green]).
- I know that,