Quote from Jreality:
As I told someone in a private message today, there is this one trader from a different board who trades using price action and he felt sorry for me, and has offered to try and help me out via Skype. He trades with another trader using Skype and they were willing to let me join in to try and help me. This trader likes to just use charts without indicators and goes for base hits (a few points at a time) rather than home runs. He made dozens of trades today. I only took two trades today (one of them was completely on my own) and one of them was while he was around on Skype. I only made $225 but it's better than losing.
I didn't use the trading room at all today, but I will still review the video to see what trades he made (just out of curiosity).
I am bummed out that my automated system would have made over 2K today based if I had taken the trade with 3 contracts of the index I'm trading, and followed the rules. However, since the indices were already down big by the time the trade was called for, I elected not to take it. However, in backtesting, if I had traded this system since the end of July, it would only be up $1688 total if had taken a total of 22 trades using 3 contracts (and that's if there isn't slippage) which which means the results are not that great since July overall but at least it is ahead in backtesting. If I had followed the rules this week I'd be up for the week instead of down big for the week though. If I had traded this system for the past 5 years using 3 contracts I would be up around $248K in total, not factoring in slippage (which is really unknown)
Anyway, the trader who is trying to help me says I should forget about the automated system and learn how to trade price action, and accept that trading is hard work. He doesn't believe the backtested system will actually work in real life, although it most definitely would have been up this week if I had traded it but not let myself break the rules. I agree that if I try to trade it with real money I should only do 1 contract (or maybe 2 at the most) in case the system goes into a slump.