Which picture will history judge ...

Quote from AAAintheBeltway:

I really thought the election would spell the end of Bush Derangement Syndrome. Guess not. Maybe it's just more fun to attack Bush than contemplate the sordid corruption that Obama's chicago cronies will bring.
That's hilarious. You nutjobs are still attacking Clinton EIGHT years later but we're supposed to forget all about Bush before he's even out of office. Like Thunderdog said: unbelievable.

Just face facts: all Presidents have screwed up at one time or another. So don't be mad if somebody attacks some pol on your side of the fence, just mount a defense for the pol IF you can, or shut up about it.

But blame shifting is not a defense. Acting like Clinton's policies were set in concrete and there was nothing Bush could do about them is not a defense, it's just a stupid lie.
 
History picture: Brave and godly American liberators. Who would jesus bomb?

The same image applies in Iraq, today.

Liberators love making Crispy Critters!


TrangBang.jpg


abu_graibh5.jpg
 
Quote from NeoRio1:

Once again for the 50th time Bush was only in office for 8 months prior to 9/11. The week security policies of Clinton deserves the most amount of blame.

As for Katrina maybe if your liberal friends in New Orleans were smart enough to know that something really bad can happen when a category 4 hurricane is coming...

Katrina was the number one biggest media liberal ploy ever. There were hundreds of people more responsible than the president during that crisis. Is Bush the mayor, governor, Fema?

As for shredding liberties the patriot act is hardly that. Even if you think it is shredding liberties your hot stud Obama won't even think about getting rid of it.

As for the Anthrax it would be impossible to heigthen security to an extreme just a few months after 9/11 especially when it comes to federal mail.

Also how many bills did Bush sign to deregulate the financial industry? Zero. Clinton signed bills to deregulate the financial industry.

The funny thing kut is that your blaming Bush about 9/11, Anthrax and the economy as if all of those crisis' were his fault. On the contrary it was Clinton's fault.

The bottom line is that you may love and even get off on hating on Bush because of your sickening emotional connection with other disgusting uninformed under-developed liberals but Bush is nowhere near as poor a president as you think him to be.

Oh, and I guess Clinton is responsible for the trillion plus deficit incurred by Bush....did he not inherit a surplus

Loads and loads of staff defecting ... lack of intellectual curiosity....good old Cheney and Haliburton

a good president? why then the most hated ever?

Oh, how about starting a war with No weapons of mass destruction....and going against the UN....loosing the respect of the world

have you ever stepped outside of the US....my guess is you vacation in Disneyland and Vegas
 
Quote from kut2k2:

That's hilarious. You nutjobs are still attacking Clinton EIGHT years later but we're supposed to forget all about Bush before he's even out of office. Like Thunderdog said: unbelievable.
Yes, excellent point. The whacko right here starts foaming at the mouth at the mere mention of Clinton's name. It's absurd how some of them are now attempting to smear Obama with the 'he's not an American citizen' rap or claiming that 'he's responsible for the Blagojevich debacle' or that 'he drinks the blood of white babies' or whatever.

I don't pretend to know enough about the inner workings of the American intelligence and counter-terrorism effort to know for sure if Bush's actions prevented or discouraged specific attacks during his post-9/11 term. I do know that his foreign policy when taken as a whole has caused a lot of resentment among moderates who might otherwise have been unequivocal in their condemnation of those who seek to harm American civilians.

One thing I have learned from reading the lunacy of the far right here - these people have never left American shores and do not read books.
 
Quote from sumosam:

Oh, and I guess Clinton is responsible for the trillion plus deficit incurred by Bush....did he not inherit a surplus

Loads and loads of staff defecting ... lack of intellectual curiosity....good old Cheney and Haliburton

a good president? why then the most hated ever?

Oh, how about starting a war with No weapons of mass destruction....and going against the UN....loosing the respect of the world

have you ever stepped outside of the US....my guess is you vacation in Disneyland and Vegas

See you call Bush the most hated president ever. If you actually knew the understandable reasons to actually hate a leader than you would not be saying this. But, sense your parents spoiled you you want your leaders to do exactly what you and dumb liberal friends feel they should do. I am sure you idiots together would most likely equal the IQ of one stoner maybe two.

What does a leader have to do in order for a person and society to hate him? Have you ever been controlled under a leader who deserved hate? What are the specific components that qualify in order to hate a leader?

See sumosam you have most likely like the large majority of Americans been spoon fed your entire life. This leads to always getting what you want. All of a sudden a leader has different views than your dumbass self and you HATE him.

The bottom line is that you toss the word hate around like a six year who just had his toy stolen by his older brother. A child in a mans body.
 
Quote from NeoRio1:

Once again for the 50th time Bush was only in office for 8 months prior to 9/11. The week security policies of Clinton deserves the most amount of blame.

As for Katrina maybe if your liberal friends in New Orleans were smart enough to know that something really bad can happen when a category 4 hurricane is coming...

Katrina was the number one biggest media liberal ploy ever. There were hundreds of people more responsible than the president during that crisis. Is Bush the mayor, governor, Fema?

As for shredding liberties the patriot act is hardly that. Even if you think it is shredding liberties your hot stud Obama won't even think about getting rid of it.

As for the Anthrax it would be impossible to heigthen security to an extreme just a few months after 9/11 especially when it comes to federal mail.

Also how many bills did Bush sign to deregulate the financial industry? Zero. Clinton signed bills to deregulate the financial industry.

The funny thing kut is that your blaming Bush about 9/11, Anthrax and the economy as if all of those crisis' were his fault. On the contrary it was Clinton's fault.

The bottom line is that you may love and even get off on hating on Bush because of your sickening emotional connection with other disgusting uninformed under-developed liberals but Bush is nowhere near as poor a president as you think him to be.
====================
Good points RioNio;
rio-grande.

And to answer the question of ''who would Jesus declare war on ?" Well the old Testament & book of Revelation , tells you exactly who Jesus declares war on.:cool:

Looks like mr B Hussein is already starting to betray Israel;
just keep an eye on the news & see.


And even better points on New Orleans, the crook-city below sea level;
the most violent city in the USA.:mad:
 
If your opponent is of choleric temper, seek to irritate him. Pretend to be weak, that he may grow arrogant.

--Sun Tzu--

Quote from nutmeg:

Hmnnn. Never antagonize a bully.
 
Back
Top