As you can see there is nothing low risk about myweeklyoption's strategy or iron condors in general.
Traders who say otherwise should repeatedly be kicked in the groin, Chuck Norris style.
Only total idiots would risk $9,500 to make a lousy $500!
Traders who say otherwise should repeatedly be kicked in the groin, Chuck Norris style.
Risk/reward is not the problem. By doing bad risk/reward you increase your probability of success. By improving the risk/reward you decrease the probability of success.
http://steadyoptions.com/articles/post/general/risk-reward-or-probability-of-success-r91
The problem is that with weekly options, you cannot control your risk due to high negative gamma. So you make your 5% 9 out of 10 times, but when you lose, you lose big time. When you trade 5-7 weeks to expiration, you can still have 90% probability trades, but you can limit your loss to a reasonable amount when you lose.

Wouldn't the same logic apply to CTA?
I am sorry but that idea just does not make any sense.
If your trading system is profitable why not sell its trading signals on the side too?
And if you only have 50 subscribers each paying you $100 a month for the signals that's 60K a year extra profit doing nothing more than what you are already doing anyway: trading.
100 subscribers? That's 120K a year doing almost nothing. Now we are talking 6 figures here.
Think about it for a second...
An audited return is a much better starting point before you trust someone with your money.
It proves a whole a lot more than the claims without evidence written on option advisory services.