Quote from Ricter:
Nice theories, but no. And predicting that I'll disagree with you adds no weight to your argument, by the way, it will have to stand on its own merits.
Love the bit about "countless hours". You are so full of shit.
Dude, I school you each and every time we discuss economics. There hasn't been a single time where you haven't ran for the exits. Then you say things like you remember Atticus schooling me, but when I ask for proof on that, you vanish again.
You know jack shit when it comes to economics, and all your info is pasted from krugman articles and yglesias blogs, and you can never support anything you cut and paste because you don't have any depth to the subjects you post. Finally, you even put me on ignore because I just beat you down so harshly - then took me off post election to "see what was going on" (which we know was so you could rub in that Obama won - not that I care if you do).
You're a fraud Ricter. A charlatan. A fake. A blowhard who pontificates on a subject he picks up from a few articles and the main stream media. What's more, you know you're a fake, and it pisses you off more than anything.
Part of it is your fault, because you're too brainwashed to seek out dissenting opinions. Part of it could be your simple lack of intelligence. It's hard to tell because one day you seem coherent and the next you're posting one-liner nonsense we all fucking laugh at and shrug "that's ricter!"
Either way, I'm sure there are subjects you're quite knowledge about. Economics, however, is certainly not one of them.
If you'd like to pick a topic regarding macro economics or finance and start a new thread, I would be happy to debate your choice of subjects with you. But we both know you'll post some smarmy comment and not accept.
So get your smarmy comment over with and disappear again.
