That does not look pleasant or easy. But it strikes me as something of a single joint movement; a very difficult fly. Plus, fortunately for me
, it doesn’t meet my personal criterion of having what I believe to be evolutionary relevance. (That was close.)Please share your thoughts.
I ask because I've read a number of articles that suggest dips are better. Not that it needs to be a mutually exclusive thing by any means. Although I have pretty much always done them, for the last several years, I have favored dips. Therefore they are my first chest exercise.
If you bend your knees and your hips, with your chin down, you will be leaning forward, and primarily activating your pecs, especially at the bottom of the movement. And the beauty part is that you can get a real stretch at the bottom. The range of motion makes it special, in my mind, anyway.I always liked dips for triceps.
I always preferred bench press because you could adjust the angle to hit different areas of the chest muscle. Incline for upper chest, flat for middle chest, and decline for lower chest. Plus I liked the ability to easily change weight to do drop sets. I always liked dips for triceps.
That used to be my thinking but some material I’ve since come across suggests otherwise, depending on positioning.It's primarily a triceps movement, but should be in every split.
Years ago, I used to have some shoulder discomfort when trying to do them specifically for triceps by keeping my body vertical. That was a mistake. Since I started doing “chest” dips by leaning forward as explained in my earlier post, the movement has been pain-free. And, again, rightly or wrongly, it is the deep range of motion that I find appealing.I stopped doing dips a long time ago because it caused pain in my shoulder joints.