Which came first? The chicken or the egg?
- Thread starter ZZZzzzzzzz
- Start date
You lost....
Direct evidence, please.
No, not some theory, but direct evidence....
No, not some theory, but direct evidence....
Evidence ?
Besides 3 billion years of evolution what else would you like? lol
The one that doesn't have one single little bit of evidence to support whatever case you are trying to imply is YOU.
Do you have any, and I mean ANY evidence to support your twisted point of view?
You don't.
We win again. hum hum
Besides 3 billion years of evolution what else would you like? lol
The one that doesn't have one single little bit of evidence to support whatever case you are trying to imply is YOU.
Do you have any, and I mean ANY evidence to support your twisted point of view?
You don't.
We win again. hum hum
3 billion years of evolution, or a couple hundred years of some scientists babbling away about evolutionary theory? Unfalsifiable theory lacking direct linkage requires speculative belief systems to maintain its existence....
My point of view is not twisted at all, it just differs from yours...
Chickens: 12
Egg: 4
My point of view is not twisted at all, it just differs from yours...
Chickens: 12
Egg: 4
See, now youâre invalidating scientific method itself. The current paradigm of evolution stands because there is a mountain of independent empirical evidence to form more general conclusions. Science isnât based on speculative belief systems. Social âScienceâ definitely is, but not real hard science.
Of course, you base your conclusions on unscientific polls, like Democrats and social âscientists.â
Of course, you base your conclusions on unscientific polls, like Democrats and social âscientists.â
I have no issue with the scientific method at all.
The scientific conclusion is a different story, or better put the way that people talk about a theory as if it were a genuine scientific conclusion is ridiculous.
If the evolutions use words like "may" or "we think" or "we believe" or "it is possible" or "it is likely in our opinion" that is nothing at all resembling a scientific conclusion.
That educated guess is just a guess....
A best guess is not in any way necessarily a right guess. So the scientists are guessing based on incomplete data...and that should be taken as a proof?
LOL...
They have no means of falsification, they are looking only for ways to make their theory more plausible, and the bonehead followers act as what the scientists say is some fact beyond any possibility of being inaccurate.
Practically speaking, the universe is not known to be a closed or an open system, as we have found no end to the universe, it is most logical to treat it as an open system, which precludes the possibility of any statement of fact as to cause and effect unless we can rule out any and all other possible causes.
No one can say that the changes that happen in biological creatures are not planned or by design, simply because they can't see a plan or they can't find a design.
Score:
Chicken 12
Egg 4
The scientific conclusion is a different story, or better put the way that people talk about a theory as if it were a genuine scientific conclusion is ridiculous.
If the evolutions use words like "may" or "we think" or "we believe" or "it is possible" or "it is likely in our opinion" that is nothing at all resembling a scientific conclusion.
That educated guess is just a guess....
A best guess is not in any way necessarily a right guess. So the scientists are guessing based on incomplete data...and that should be taken as a proof?
LOL...
They have no means of falsification, they are looking only for ways to make their theory more plausible, and the bonehead followers act as what the scientists say is some fact beyond any possibility of being inaccurate.
Practically speaking, the universe is not known to be a closed or an open system, as we have found no end to the universe, it is most logical to treat it as an open system, which precludes the possibility of any statement of fact as to cause and effect unless we can rule out any and all other possible causes.
No one can say that the changes that happen in biological creatures are not planned or by design, simply because they can't see a plan or they can't find a design.
Score:
Chicken 12
Egg 4
You lose again...
You lose again, because you are a born loser, and even when you win, you lose...
You don't even know what game you are actually playing, which is why you continue to lose....
You lose again, because you are a born loser, and even when you win, you lose...
You don't even know what game you are actually playing, which is why you continue to lose....
There is no winner or loser in this discussion, remember? Go back and look at your own posts, you're the one who said it, lol. (It's an interesting prospect that you might, for once, admit that you were wrong, for the purpose of continuing to tell me I lose. I doubt you will.)
Your posting the score, chicken vs. egg, is a bandwagon argument of course, and since there is no winning or losing in this discussion, according to you, it's pointless to display it. Very simple, but you missed it.
Give direct evidence that you're not a moron. So far all you've done is give the opposite. Oh, by the way, since you absolutely suck ass at extrapolating, you may as well believe that my real opinion of you could very well be the highest esteem. Sure, there is zero evidence of that, but absence of evidence is not proof, right?