You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Which came first? The chicken or the egg?
- Thread starter ZZZzzzzzzz
- Start date
Present me with proof that you don't beat your wife, or girlfriend, or boyfriend, or children, or parents, or yourself, ad infinitum.....
Show me some examples of a chicken laying an egg that is more "like" a grouse than like a chicken.
Show me some examples of a chicken laying an egg that is more "like" a grouse than like a chicken.
Quote from Ricter:
Present me with proof that mutant progeny don't happen. Besides, I said more "like" a grouse.
Actually, the reason is quite clear why the chicken(s) came before the egg.
The hen lays the egg, but the rooster fertilizes it.
Then, the hen keep the egg at proper temperature. Then when the baby chicken is hatched out of the egg, it cannot take care of itself, and needs the mother hen to protect and care for the baby chick.
If an egg came first, with no fertilization, no hen to sit on the eggs, no hen to rear the chick, the chick would not survive.....it is therefore pretty clear that the chicken came first....then the egg.
The hen lays the egg, but the rooster fertilizes it.
Then, the hen keep the egg at proper temperature. Then when the baby chicken is hatched out of the egg, it cannot take care of itself, and needs the mother hen to protect and care for the baby chick.
If an egg came first, with no fertilization, no hen to sit on the eggs, no hen to rear the chick, the chick would not survive.....it is therefore pretty clear that the chicken came first....then the egg.
Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:
Actually, the reason is quite clear why the chicken(s) came before the egg.
The hen lays the egg, but the rooster fertilizes it.
Then, the hen keep the egg at proper temperature. Then when the baby chicken is hatched out of the egg, it cannot take care of itself, and needs the mother hen to protect and care for the baby chick.
If an egg came first, with no fertilization, no hen to sit on the eggs, no hen to rear the chick, the chick would not survive.....it is therefore pretty clear that the chicken came first....then the egg.
uh? what a sudden change of heart innit
No your theories are wrong because they are wrong.
That you type like a moron is of no consequence to the rightness or wrongness of your theories.
I still don't understand why you type like a moron, but if it makes you happy.
At least you have a choice to type like a moron or not, many people don't even have that choice...
That you type like a moron is of no consequence to the rightness or wrongness of your theories.
I still don't understand why you type like a moron, but if it makes you happy.
At least you have a choice to type like a moron or not, many people don't even have that choice...
Quote from Bitstream:
uh? sayin' that my theories are wrong just cuz u find 'em so doesn't prove a thing.
Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:
Present me with proof that you don't beat your wife, or girlfriend, or boyfriend, or children, or parents, or yourself, ad infinitum.....
Show me some examples of a chicken laying an egg that is more "like" a grouse than like a chicken.
How about if I show you an example of a bird that hatched from a chicken egg, but we would call it a mutant, ie. quite different from a chicken? How about if I show you examples of many types of mutant offspring? How about if you then take a simple step in logical thinking and admit that, with enough examples, we'd undoubtedly find an offspring that "aint no chicken", yet it's perfectly capable of mating and creating offspring that share its appearance? I'm sure I don't need to warn you that many of these pics are grotesque.