which broker to choose?

Quote from alanm:

If you look carefully at those supplemental policies, they usually have an aggregate limit across the whole policy. Some brokers quote that aggregate amount only, while others quote the per-account limit (if there is one) without the aggregate (or put it in small print), while others do the right thing and tell you about both.

So, it might be $5M per account, with a total of $100M for the whole firm. If the firm has $300M in accounts, you can get boned if they crash.

Alan, it's per account. but thanks anyway!
 
conbar, Ameritrade is good specially if you choose to use direct routing options in Ameritrade. They have been offering that option for quite some time now. (Unlike choosing ARCA from IB,) you can use ARCA's re-routing options that will re-route your order to different venues , On the other hand, Scottrade and Izone (Ameritrade-Izone) do not have direct routing options. If prompt dedicated customer service is not an issue, then IB is definitely good for low to mid-volume day-traders. IB has direct access routings, low margin rate and offer per-share pricing. I encountered all of them.
 
Quote from Donkell:

Unless I missed it, nothing has been said about how limited you are going to be on which stocks you deal with.

I trade 2 to 3k a trade, and am very limited on which stocks can handle that much. I would hate to see what happens if you put a market order to sell a stock going against you, trading over 5K.

In my opinion they are going to eat you alive. Your original question was between AMTD and Cybertrader which to me means you plan on daytrading.

Maybe I missed something but not many stocks trade high enough vol to make this even remotely easy.

Good luck.

no Donkell, I am not planing to daytrade.

I am planig either to:

swing - base decisions on 60m timeframe (and use daily and weekly timeframes as complimentary). hold positions from 2days to 1.5weeks. place stop-losses according to 60m volatility/60m patterns.
I dont know how to explain, every stock has different volatility. lets take CSCO as an example. Under this (swing) strategy I will be happy if my 50000 CSCO order will be filled within 5-7 cents, assuming the market is calm.
Am I saying very stupid things here?

or

if execution will pose a big problem in 60m tmeframe, I will use daily timeframe as the main one and use weekly timeframe as complimentary. here I will place stop-losses according to daily volatility.
 
On the other hand, Scottrade and Izone (Ameritrade-Izone) do not have direct routing options.

that's what I dont like

I also dont like the fact that Ameri and Scott sell a lion share of their order flow to third parties...
 
wait a minute...

Ameritrade is good specially if you choose to use direct routing options in Ameritrade.

didnt you just contradicted yourself?

they do or they dont have it?
 
conbar, ARCA has the capability to re-route your order if other venues have the better prices. Because of ARCA's re-routing capability, it's popular. ARCA charges a fraction of a cent extra per share if your order gets executed after re-routing. IB doesn't let its clients use ARCA's re-routing capability. IB uses its own auto-routing (smart routing). Ameritrade eats ARCA's extra charge for re-rouitng. You can search for ARCA rerouting in "Order Execution" forum to know more.

You might want to ask the brokers directly how much the discounted brokers sell their orders to 3rd parties. They should have it published somewhere. Lowtrades have it published.

Ameritrade has the options to choose direct routing venues if you want. (You have to select it from Preferences menu.) Ameritrade and AmeritradeIzone are different in terms of their features and commissions. AmeritradeIzone, Scottrade, etc. don't have the options to choose direct routings. They let their auto-route decide the venues.
 
the above is called arca proactive. arca is the only ecn i believe that reroutes. this is huge as the fills are great on markets. i suspect ib doesn't do this because it's .001 more per share
 
Back
Top