Sent a pm, but for everyone else too:
On the thinkorswim.com website under "why think or swim" and click "rate, commissions, and fees" the listed rate for EX/Rates#2 for Options is .95 per contract with a 19.95 minimum per leg so if you are trading more than 20 contracts then it is worth it. I know they can go a little lower than that but you have to do a lot more than 20 contracts. That is an all in rate with no software or quote charges. Not the lowest you can get but with their customer service being the best in the industry it is not too bad.
So you would need to be doing 20+ contracts per trade, as in a single trade of 20 contracts or a 20 lot IC (which would be 20*4 legs=80 contracts). As I have said before, if you want low rates and are a small trader then TOS may not be the best fit.
As to PM at IB vs. TOS, it is simply not true that they are the same. IB is more restrictive overall, but it depends on the actual position you are talking about. Backing the statement up, as someone asked for, it a waste of time. I have yet to find anyone who actually understands PM disagree with the statement, and it is not worth the time to teach that person PM.
On the thinkorswim.com website under "why think or swim" and click "rate, commissions, and fees" the listed rate for EX/Rates#2 for Options is .95 per contract with a 19.95 minimum per leg so if you are trading more than 20 contracts then it is worth it. I know they can go a little lower than that but you have to do a lot more than 20 contracts. That is an all in rate with no software or quote charges. Not the lowest you can get but with their customer service being the best in the industry it is not too bad.
So you would need to be doing 20+ contracts per trade, as in a single trade of 20 contracts or a 20 lot IC (which would be 20*4 legs=80 contracts). As I have said before, if you want low rates and are a small trader then TOS may not be the best fit.
As to PM at IB vs. TOS, it is simply not true that they are the same. IB is more restrictive overall, but it depends on the actual position you are talking about. Backing the statement up, as someone asked for, it a waste of time. I have yet to find anyone who actually understands PM disagree with the statement, and it is not worth the time to teach that person PM.
