"Only a poor pricing will lead to a statistical hedge but again it is not inherent..."
Are we talking about using pricing to develop a statistical hedge, or a system that has an edge because it wins in 4 of 5 possible scenarios. I think there is a difference. I believe there is an edge to selling a 2011 put on IBM for $365 that is $35 OTM as oppossed to buying a 2011 call/put that is $35 OTM.
The most intelligent criticism of selling puts deals with risk management and I have learned the hard way about selling options with high IV to collect premium. But I believe when managed properly, collecting premium will be a more consistent income producer than buying premium.
Are we talking about using pricing to develop a statistical hedge, or a system that has an edge because it wins in 4 of 5 possible scenarios. I think there is a difference. I believe there is an edge to selling a 2011 put on IBM for $365 that is $35 OTM as oppossed to buying a 2011 call/put that is $35 OTM.
The most intelligent criticism of selling puts deals with risk management and I have learned the hard way about selling options with high IV to collect premium. But I believe when managed properly, collecting premium will be a more consistent income producer than buying premium.
What made you come up with this nick?