Quote from secxces:
One other thing I would like to comment on.
Volatility Analysis in the Forex
I know no broker can adequately / realistically provide proper volume for any currency pair, due to no centralization. However, if my thoughts are correct, using a moving average of volume or any volume based lagging indicator for that matter, would still prove to be in good use. By good use I mean, they show exactly what they are suppose to show and would show the similar / relatively similarly the same thing as if there were a central exchange and volume could be calculated correctly. I mean, if lets say your using two moving averages of volume, and you look for an increase in volume to trade in the manner you do so, when the two cross you would say, there is adequate volume in the market. IMO the cross would occur in the same position/close to the same, as if it were centralized. I cant see the volume beeing off so much that it would effect things like this in anyway. The general direction of smoothed volume cant be wrong. Or am I wrong?
Comments?
-secXces
I never found volume to be much use on forex (or hsi for that method).
My test is: does the confirmation (or whatever setup it gives) result in an overall improvement in my expectancy.
For forex (see too little of the total volume) and hsi (too many games being played at critical junctures) it didn't generate an improvement. For Nk and US stocks and indexes it was useful.
So I trade price only for hsi and forex (with a couple of mas to improve my perception of trend, support and resistance).