Where was Hillary Clinton when all these women were assaulted?

wildchild

wildchild

She was taking Weinstein's money and she had a big smile on her face while she was doing it. I thought women were supposed to vote for Hillary because she was such a big advocate for them. Its funny, when leftists say they are your advocate, they are actually your worst enemy.

Obama was supposed to be a big advocate for black people, how did that turn out?
 
wildchild said:
Obama was supposed to be a big advocate for black people, how did that turn out?
More...

Better than under Trump.Black people have always been better off with Presidents that represent The Union States rather than the confederate states.
 
Last edited:
You worry about women wildchild?. I guess below are just breaking a few eggs for the 'winning'.

I do wonder how your souls will get judged.


http://www.newsweek.com/trump-has-already-killed-more-civilians-obama-us-fight-against-isis-653564
The U.S.-led coalition fighting the Islamic State militant group (ISIS) has killed more civilians during President Donald Trump's first seven months in office than in the three years it existed under his predecessor, according to the latest estimate by a U.K.-based monitor.

Airwars, which describes itself as a "journalist-led transparency project," released Tuesday its latest data on airstrikes reportedly conducted by the U.S. and its allies battling ISIS and other jihadists in Iraq and Syria. According to data gathered since the coalition's inception in October 2014, the U.S.-dominated multinational force has been responsible for a minimum of 5,117 civilian deaths, with about 55 percent of them occurring during Trump's administration. While the stage of the conflict inherited by the Republican leader has largely involved targeting ISIS's urban strongholds after allied gains elsewhere under former President Barack Obama, Trump has faced backlash at home and abroad over reports of mounting collateral damage.

"During @BarackObama's 29 months at helm of ISIS war we tracked 855 alleged civilian casualty events which likely killed 2298-3398 civilians," Airwars tweeted to the group's official account.

"In @realDonaldTrump's first 7 months as President, we tracked 1,196 alleged incidents in which we assess at least 2,819-4,529 civilians died," it added.
 
Sorry, but, relying on some journalists to estimate the number of deaths is pretty dumb. They have a nasty habit these days of making shit up, usually to fit their agenda.

Slartibartfast said:
You worry about women wildchild?. I guess below are just breaking a few eggs for the 'winning'.

I do wonder how your souls will get judged.


http://www.newsweek.com/trump-has-already-killed-more-civilians-obama-us-fight-against-isis-653564
The U.S.-led coalition fighting the Islamic State militant group (ISIS) has killed more civilians during President Donald Trump's first seven months in office than in the three years it existed under his predecessor, according to the latest estimate by a U.K.-based monitor.

Airwars, which describes itself as a "journalist-led transparency project," released Tuesday its latest data on airstrikes reportedly conducted by the U.S. and its allies battling ISIS and other jihadists in Iraq and Syria. According to data gathered since the coalition's inception in October 2014, the U.S.-dominated multinational force has been responsible for a minimum of 5,117 civilian deaths, with about 55 percent of them occurring during Trump's administration. While the stage of the conflict inherited by the Republican leader has largely involved targeting ISIS's urban strongholds after allied gains elsewhere under former President Barack Obama, Trump has faced backlash at home and abroad over reports of mounting collateral damage.

"During @BarackObama's 29 months at helm of ISIS war we tracked 855 alleged civilian casualty events which likely killed 2298-3398 civilians," Airwars tweeted to the group's official account.

"In @realDonaldTrump's first 7 months as President, we tracked 1,196 alleged incidents in which we assess at least 2,819-4,529 civilians died," it added.
More...
 
elderado said:
Sorry, but, relying on some journalists to estimate the number of deaths is pretty dumb. They have a nasty habit these days of making shit up, usually to fit their agenda.
More...


Well, that plus the fact that Obama never fought Isis/the JV Team for real and let them create fiefdoms within Mosul and Raqqa. The liberation of those cities under trump has indeed cost civilian casualites. There is not a single soldier or civilian in those cities that has not confirmed in vivid detail that isis always fights with civilians being used as shields.

When they do the math on this down at the Michael Moore Think Tank they seldom give you the net number. It is a fact- unless you are an Obama bootlicker- that cilivians were being slaughtered by the thousands in mosul and raqqa in the most gruesome ways possible. Let's just agree that that number of civilians being killed byy isis will be less now that the cities have been or are being occupied. Do the lefties calculate in the number of souls saved? Didn't think so.

Great way to avoid civilian casualties Obama- just let isis kill all of them. Idiot.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top