Where is the right place seeking funds for trading?

Angry? LOL, I seldom get angry, 95% lose for a host of reasons and generally they are too smart, they are unable to stay with a set of rules more than couple losses, and most don't keep hugely backtested stats.

Your have backtested this how long? If you noticed this forum more for Traders and not Investors. For long term systems, I will back test 50 years or longer on weekly bars, for myself anything under 3,000 sample size is just too small and for day trading my last system had over 26,000 sample size. You have to know what kinds of drawdowns in all economy cycles it will do. You will never be able to continue 20% per month if you do litely traded stocks if your account grows too big as you will be paying overpriced to get in.

You intentions might be good, but people simple not going to toss money into someone who has no history no matter how much you might tested or simmed. I have several methods that can double every 3 months, but when traded real time they simple lose cause you have slippage, always giving up the tick and commissions can be high.

Do you realize most people on this forum have seen mountains of vendors offering huge returns? Larry Williams back in the 80s did over 10,000% return in one year and yet managing money he lost the next year. At one time he was actually up over 30,000%. Few years later even his daughter won contest, don't know if she even managed money next year.

When I use to teach folks how to day trade for a fee, I gave them three years of monthly brokerage statements and my fee came from their profits. If you have some type of audit returns for min of year, then people have something to go on, but even then it bot going to be easy. Dealing with the public is a pain in the arse.

https://collective2.com/?creativeid=75530120901&keyword=collective 2&campaignid=16452501&adgroupid=460569561&utm_nooverride=1&gclid=CLiZ_qyNg8kCFQYdaQodFCoLSw

i respect your experience. i have a very short exp in a small prop firm. there, on one back-test result because hardly can they be tested. initially i am shocked coz i think back test is important. after awhile, i gradually believe it but i explored in a different approach...
what i can tell is, in our earth, there do a certain ppl who trade without back-testing and can earn a lot of money...

thanks for your advice, i will have a look on collective2
 
Question: When you work for prop firm, if you design a very good system, who owns the rights to this system? I assume you sign some type of contract, right? Are all different? These are questions those who want to work this way should ask.

Yea, lot of brokers in old days would front run in their accounts to tail coat better traders and just tag along. Am sure smaller brokers watch to see who is doing well and study at what price they went into trades. I just wonder how hard would it be to program a clients and get same trades in their account? And is that legal?
 
but i have no capitals...

I have been trading the market manually and monitor my positions in every second using simulators in the past 2 months. So, my record is real (not back-test) except that it is on simulator level. Due to the nature of my trading (not by any news, not any reports, not any indicators, no outrights also, only natural observations), I need more capital (around USD 400,000) to place orders...

I'm going to tell you exactly what someone else did that was in the same shoes as you and he really wanted to be a trader and do such for a living. Thus, it was not a hobby to him and he needed advice.

Its far too early for you to be asking others for capital especially via what you've described about your trading (e.g. 2 months of simulator, needing a minimum of 400k, trading via natural observations).

1) Find a rich relative if you're not willing to live poor and work multiple jobs to save that type of money.

2) Sell everything you have if you have anything worth while to sell.

3) Become a criminal and preferably something that pays well (e.g. bank robbery, embezzlement, bribery of someone that's rich and important that that something illegal, erotic dancing and so on). There's available books online about how to do such properly.

You may think I'm joking about the erotic dancing part that's mentioned above. I knew someone that paid for her entire medical school education and still pocketed 80k after paying off her entire costs of school prior to getting her M.D. at a very expensive school. She's now a Thoracic surgeon (heart, lungs and esophagus).

Yet, if you're not a woman, not good looking, not good at dancing and not good at eye contact...forget the erotic dancing.

4) Meet someone much older than you and very rich. Make them feel special, they fall in love and gives you the money, cars and expensive gifts that you can easily re-sell. Essentially the person becomes your sugar daddy/mama. Lots of people in Hollywood do such via only dating rich/famous people (e.g. Kardashians date only celebrities).

I did mention above that I gave my friend similar like advice. He did 1) and 4)...raised almost 1 million in less than a year.

5) Change your trade method so that you don't need 400k. Instead, you can do it via say 25k. Then you can raise that 25k very fast via any of the above 4 options I gave you and trade it until you make 400k and then you can go back to your other trade method that requires 400k minimum. :cool:

Usually, a profitable trader can create another profitable trade method. In fact, its normal for a profitable trader to have more than one trade method.
 
Question: When you work for prop firm, if you design a very good system, who owns the rights to this system? I assume you sign some type of contract, right? Are all different? These are questions those who want to work this way should ask.

Yea, lot of brokers in old days would front run in their accounts to tail coat better traders and just tag along. Am sure smaller brokers watch to see who is doing well and study at what price they went into trades. I just wonder how hard would it be to program a clients and get same trades in their account? And is that legal?
but i have no capitals. my trading record is not back-testing record (because even it is profitable in back-test level, ppl may lose in real market). I have been trading the market manually and monitor my positions in every second using simulators in the past 2 months. So, my record is real (not back-test) except that it is on simulator level. Due to the nature of my trading(not by any news, not any reports, not any indicators, no outrights also, only natural observations), I need more capital (around USD 400,000) to place orders. i know my trading is a little bit special so i don't know how to persuade investors to give me more capitals. but i can tell investors that the open trade loss will be less than a very small value and investors can stop my trading if exceed this value. do you think this is persuasive?

in average, my monthly return is 15-20% and sharp ratio 0.42. As for my special trading style, technically, profit/loss need to be redistributed. Hence, the daily P&L will have some great positive and negative values. So the standard derivation of daily return is high, resulting the low sharp ratio. so sharp ratio may not be an appropriate measure to evaluate my performance that's why i said my trading is very special but do very profitable. do you know who will be interested in these "out-of-the-box" trading methods? I know traditional prop firm won't be interested coz they will ask me to follow many rules...

I believe you are sincere and honest in your efforts. most creators of trading systems and/or algorithms believe that their creation is out of the box but they are actually quite rare.

it is unlikely there are firms that will want to use a system which has a large draw down. draw downs are one of the first questions potential partners will ask about.
 
Even a small Real money account, traded for min 1year if not 2years, then you might have a chance, but from demo no chance at all.

Why do you need 400K, what are you trading, I'm going to presume you need that level of capital as it's a martingaling, averaging down, Zero loss system and you figure you need 400K to not get Margin called and therefore account blown ??

No body will back a Martingaling average down system, they look great for ages, then bang all gone!
 
Question: When you work for prop firm, if you design a very good system, who owns the rights to this system? I assume you sign some type of contract, right? Are all different? These are questions those who want to work this way should ask.

Yea, lot of brokers in old days would front run in their accounts to tail coat better traders and just tag along. Am sure smaller brokers watch to see who is doing well and study at what price they went into trades. I just wonder how hard would it be to program a clients and get same trades in their account? And is that legal?
may be trader and his boss. normally other traders don't know. everything is possible. just negotiate. for copying question, i also have this concern but i think it is very difficult for broker to do it. i don't know much indeed...
 
Back
Top