Where is futurecurrents?

[fhl]

 

[futurecurrents]

No and no.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_opinion_on_climate_change

 

[futurecurrents]

Its pretty simple.
The oceans have been warming since the last ice age.
Co2 levels trail ocean warming and cooling.
The question is therefore shot not be what is causing co2 to go up but what is causing the ocean warming since the last ice age.

By the way... not worked by futurecurrents or stu (obviously paid empty "content creation" trolls except when they misrepresent what I wrote) ... but will get a bit charged when discussing the issue with people with real minds like Nitro.

And yet no reputable climate scientist denies it and every one of them agrees AGW is real. Along with the Weather Channel and Exxon.

Come on jerm, come up with ONE climate scientist. Or just go away and shut the fuck up already.

 

[jem]

You are a real piece of work fraudcurrents. You even lie about the scientists.

 

[futurecurrents]

You are a real piece of work fraudcurrents. You even lie about the scientists.

Come on you deluded right wing loon.....ONE climatologist that denies AGW. Surely you can find one if the consensus is only .06 % think AGW is true... as you have maintained.

 

[gwb-trading]

Come on you deluded right wing loon.....ONE climatologist that denies AGW. Surely you can find one if the consensus is only .06 % think AGW is true... as you have maintained.

How many time do we need to post a complete list for futurecurrents to stop asking this nonsense question over and over and over again

Let's start with Dr. Judith Curry, leader of the Climate Department at Georgia Tech.

 

[futurecurrents]

How many time do we need to post a complete list for futurecurrents to stop asking this nonsense question over and over and over again

Let's start with Dr. Judith Curry, leader of the Climate Department at Georgia Tech.

I take you off ignore for one time thinking you might not be the offensively stupid moron that you have always been and guess what ? You still are.

Judith Curry certainly does NOT deny AGW. You continue to be an idiot.

 

[nitro]

NASA: 10,000-year-old Antarctic ice shelf will disappear by 2020

http://www.cnn.com/2015/05/16/us/antarctica-larsen-b-ice-shelf-to-disappear/index.html


WHERE IS FUTURECURRENTS? WHO IS FUTURECURRENTS?

 

[nitro]

Obama: Climate change 'growing and urgent threat'

http://www.cnn.com/2014/09/23/politics/obama-un-climate-change/index.html

 

[gwb-trading]

I take you off ignore for one time thinking you might not be the offensively stupid moron that you have always been and guess what ? You still are.

Judith Curry certainly does NOT deny AGW. You continue to be an idiot.

I would urge you to go read Judith Curry's blog - http://judithcurry.com/

She questions the accuracy of IPCC climate projections and states that there is no data which demonstrates that the amount of CO2 generated by man has any significant impact on climate. She is what you would define as a "denier".

Judith Curry (unlike AGW Supporters) regularly invites scientists with different perspectives to guest write on her climate Etc. blog. Just a couple weeks ago you attempted to improperly claim that a blog post written by Zeke Hausfather of the BerkelyEarth foundation (Understanding adjustments to temperature data) was written Dr. Curry - it was not. So certainly you must be aware of her perspectives and work.

You have constantly proclaimed for weeks that jem should just find you just one climate scientist that disagrees with AGW over and over and over again. He has provided you an entire list of scientists - including 5 of the Climate Department heads at the top 10 U.S. scientific universities on the list. But you just keep ignoring his information and making the same fabricated demands. Obviously you do not desire to have a rational discourse regarding climate science, nor are you willing to listen to others with opposing points of view backed by facts and data.