You know, I have found it so interesting that, over the years, we have gotten so many traders from what you refer to as "prop" - meaning that they don't pay out 100%, and yet still charge commissions to their traders.
If you think about it, a trader who, for lack of putting up a few bucks, will think he is "hired" ...for no salary or draw, and think he is going to remain more than a couple of months if he doesn't perform. This is pure fantasy.
For example, I was chatting with one of my better traders who spent a couple years with one of the (if not "The") largest firms who do not accept deposits. So, here are some facts.
When he would generate $30,000 gross per month, the firm kept about $10,000 for commissions, leaving $20,000, of which he would get between $5,000 and $12,000 (over the years) ... and this wasn't even paid out immediately, this firm actually kept a big part of the money for payout a year or more later (a "golden handcuff" if you will).
So, when this trader and his group finally could take no more of this abuse, they decided to keep a couple of months earnings, join our Firm, and now run their own business, within ours, and keep 100% of their earnings...
So, by investing in yourself vs. being under the thumb and dictate of someone else, these people (not from just one firm, but 3 that I can think of), our traders are essentially doubling their earnings. To me, this is the sign of a good business person, who will do well in life.
Having a "job" is fine, but probably much more risky than (and less profitable) than working for one's self, as evidenced by all the talent that has been fired the last few years.
Our business model duplicates what my brother and I enjoyed when we first started. We had to by seats on the exchange (a bit costly), but thought it was great that if we put up a few bucks to SLK (now Goldman Sachs), and they would allow us to use their capital to trade with, and we got to keep all of our profits, and we were not at risk of being fired....we were in charge of our own destiny.
This arrangement is not for everyone, but appeals to a lot of traders, because traders tend to be independent, and not afraid to invest in their own future.
I can think of one firm, FNYS, that does have a good plan for "employee type" traders, but they only add a handful of traders each year (I'm basing this on my understanding of their training and business model). The other "props" in the industry today are few and far between....because....if you think about it, why should these firms "pay" anyone to risk their money for them, when they can do it themselves with the technology available?
Our hundreds of independent traders have a very limited downside, an unlimited upside, and can use our capital to engage in working strategies that they could not otherwise take part in.
There will always be "worker bees" and there will always be entrepreneurs in this great Country of ours....and Bright Trading simly caters to the latter group. Our people come in with their eyes wide open and see full disclosure on our part.
One final thing, if you really looked at some of the contracts of some of these "prop" shops you refer to, you would be astounded, I know I am.
All the best,
Don ( I submit the above with full respect to your opinion)
edit: Many of our traders also come from the PDT environment so that they can receive interest on short stock, lower per share costs, and use enough capital to participate in strategies that actually work vs. the directional gambling most retail people are stuck trying to do. FWIW. I think our traders have a much better chance to survive and thrive than the average PDT guy trying to pick a stock, or pick a direction. It does "take money to make money" in this business.