Quote from illiquid:
But seriously, why bother going "true" prop if you are already successful? Besides 50% of your profits, what else do you need to give away for such a deal? A firm covering your losses is not worth much at all -- you're consistently profitble, correct?. A salary? Same thing.
Excellent question.
The reason why I WAS looking for a prop was to get access to a large Portfolio.
Think about it: When a trader makes 10k consistently with a 100k Portfolio, how much does the trader with 10 Million? Right, 1 Million. And how much she gets using a 50/50 profit split model? Right, 500k. Thats the motivation behind finding a prop.
However, im not loooking anymore for a prop because they are much more interested in candidates having a degree and have already worked at a hedge fund (or similar) than being profitable.
Another Problem with going to a prop is that you might not have full autonomy regarding to the trading strategy. Maybe you are required to adhere to their risk schemes, what might mean that you cannot apply your profitable strategy. In addition, other restrictions might exist.
So your right, at the end of the day you are much better off alone as an independent trader than joining a prop firm anyway.
Another fact is that the true prop trading business nowadays mainly use quantitative Trading. So they are looking for programmers (i.E. C++) who develop strategies and backtest using MATLAB. However, is this automatic trading really more successful than the "old school" manual trading? I doubt it.
Another thought is, that maybe there are better ways to get access to a large portfolio than joining a prop. Any ideas of such possibilities?