When it comes to crime, Democrats are in danger of being mugged by reality

Tony Stark said:
Unlike your kind I don't believe in violating black and brown peoples rights,racial profiling,police stopping black and brown people without actual cause etc.
More...
I agree with you no one should be stopped with no cause
Its not about actual cause
BLM is against stopping POC even with actual cause....

Again you default to the most sinister conclusion...That police are looking to stop without cause.
Cops dont want to waste time doing things that are likely not to have results
Cops spend all day driving streets they have a pretty good sense of suspicious activity
 
Mercor said:
I agree with you no one should be stopped with no cause
Its not about actual cause
BLM is against stopping POC even with actual cause....
More...



No,you and your kind do not

It is about actual cause

BLM is not against stopping POC with actual cause....
 
Last edited:
Mercor said:
Cops dont want to waste time doing things that are likely not to have results
Cops spend all day driving streets they have a pretty good sense of suspicious activity
More...

You might want to re think that genius


(NYs Stop and Frisk stats before being shut down by a federal court)

The number of stops increased dramatically in 2008 to over half a million, 88% of which did not result in any fine or conviction, peaking in 2011 to 685,724 stops, again with 88% (603,437) resulting in no conviction.




So 9 out of 10 and 603,437 stops resulted in no conviction but according to you cops dont want to waste time doing things that are likely not to have results and cops spend all day driving streets so they have a pretty good sense of suspicious activity:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:
 
Mercor said:
Again you default to the most sinister conclusion...That police are looking to stop without cause.
More...


It was actually proved in federal court smart guy


https://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/13/nyregion/stop-and-frisk-practice-violated-rights-judge-rules.html

Judge Scheindlin concluded that the stops, which soared in number over the last decade as crime continued to decline, demonstrated a widespread disregard for the Fourth Amendment, which protects against unreasonable searches and seizures by the government, as well as the 14th Amendment’s equal protection clause.

The judge found that for much of the last decade, patrol officers had stopped innocent people without any objective reason to suspect them of wrongdoing.

What you consider sinister,is reality
 
Mercor said:
Again you default to the most sinister conclusion...That police are looking to stop without cause.
Cops dont want to waste time doing things that are likely not to have results
Cops spend all day driving streets they have a pretty good sense of suspicious activity
More...
lolwut

upload_2022-2-17_19-42-49.png
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top