When it comes to crime, Democrats are in danger of being mugged by reality

userque said:
Make your own case.

Right now, as everyone can clearly see, all you're doing here is poppin shit.

200.gif
More...

Rational people can go back and read my posts about Durham and make up their own minds. I have provided my contention and and endless list of articles, official crime stats and budget information to support it.

The best you can do is post animated gifs.
 
gwb-trading said:
Rational people can go back and read my posts about Durham and make up their own minds. I have provided my contention and and endless list of articles, official crime stats and budget information to support it.

The best you can do is post animated gifs.
More...
No one is sifting through your post-diarrhea in order to make your case for you.

You have clearly lost it; or you think everyone else is stupid.

If you posted sources previously, then you should repeat those sources whenever you repeat the contention. But you don't. Because you are lying about having sources.

It's that simple.
 
userque said:
No one is sifting through your post-diarrhea in order to make your case for you.

You have clearly lost it; or you think everyone else is stupid.

If you posted sources previously, then you should repeat those sources whenever you repeat the contention. But you don't. Because you are lying about having sources.

It's that simple.
More...

Once again -- I have posted my contention and and endless list of articles, official crime stats and budget information to support it. I am not going to re-post it all over again, nor am I going to re-post links to all the previously posted information.

Of course -- you and "Tony Stark" will just do the same thing as Tony did above -- just clip one paragraph from a single article to make a claim that something is merely "proposed" while ignoring all the other articles showing what was actually implemented. The cutting of 5 positions and freezing of 15 more positions.

This nonsense is getting old -- and it is not worth my time to educate the closed minded about the timeline and events in Durham (where I live) in regards to the defunding of police over the past several years and the soaring crime.
 
gwb-trading said:
This nonsense is getting old
More...
You not posting any sources, while claiming you did, is getting old.

Some people may buy that bullshit. I don't.

And on occasions when you do finally post a source, it usually doesn't support your contention. It's just another of millions of articles you post per year.

There's a reason both sides here think you lack integrity and credibility.
 
gwb-trading said:
Yes... and as shown in all the other articles they cut 15 police positions in order to fund their "community safety division". Their "community safety division" of course has been a complete failure.
More...


From your previous source-The official budget


2020 budget

upload_2022-2-16_18-35-50.png




2021 budget

upload_2022-2-16_18-36-13.png





2022 budget


upload_2022-2-16_18-36-38.png
 
userque said:
Yeah. He posted millions of papers.

Listen carefully:

He didn't post a source that supports his contention.

Clear?
More...

I posted an entire string of sources that support my contention. The sources include everything from official crime stats, yearly budgets & addendums, quotes from city council members on defunding the police, information on the proposals & result of council meetings in regards to funding the policy, in-depth historical articles covering the entire "defund the police" movement in Durham, and much more. At this point there is really nothing more I can provide to outline my contention. I find it ludicrous to find that anyone would claim that I have not supported by contention -- but you do you.

In the meantime we are working locally on how to vote the progressive DA out of office in 2022 and eliminate our crime spiral nightmare.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top