Mmmm, by the time you get up to 7-9 contracts, you might as well switch to 1 mini, so you save on exchange fees, and won't have to worry about partial fills on the micro.
You are right. After a while, 1 full NQ contract is more cost efficient. Another positive day. From a total amount it's not much. But from a process POV, it was good. Shorted, then reversed and went long when I should.
But the real edge is better risk mgmt. Patterns are good. In the past and even now I rely too much on patterns. While the pattern might be eventually right, it's dangerous. So now I just get out fast when things change. Especially when things change fast. With MNQ, it gives me good practice of getting out of losses without a big hit to the account. Then I can recover easily.
I really want to cement processes down with multiple MNQs then scale to 1 NQ then scale to multiple NQs.
