Wheels Abbott pulls all the stops to change SNOWVID21 Texas narrative

Tsing Tao said:
Except that it isn't nonsense, and I've backed it up with multiple data sources.

Hypocrite doesn't like being called out. Film at 11.
More...

Well in this case post the Tweet with the source, not just some random, unattributed chart.

Of course this works better when the Twitter accounts you use as a source are not on the verge of being removed for spreading COVID misinformation.
 
gwb-trading said:
Well in this case post the Tweet with the source, not just some random, unattributed chart.

Of course this works better when the Twitter accounts you use as a source are not on the verge of being removed for spreading COVID misinformation.
More...

Its a no-win proposition. I post a chart with a tweet and you ignore the chart and attack the user. I post a chart by itself and you ignore the chart and shriek about how the source is needed- despite the data being readily available in numerous sources.

The point, of course, is that you ignore the chart (which is what matters) and just want to discredit the source (which is not at all what matters).

If Trump was able to tweet and he tweeted "2 + 2 = 4" then the fact that it is Trump is irrelevant to the math that 2+2 does indeed = 4. But you would say "Trump supports injecting bleach and blah blah blah" while ignoring that 2+2=4.

I don't care about all the other stuff. I just care about 2+2=4. If you can't prove otherwise, you go after the source.

It's also interesting to know that Ricter supports this method of attack.
 
Tsing Tao said:
Its a no-win proposition. I post a chart with a tweet and you ignore the chart and attack the user. I post a chart by itself and you ignore the chart and shriek about how the source is needed- despite the data being readily available in numerous sources.

The point, of course, is that you ignore the chart (which is what matters) and just want to discredit the source (which is not at all what matters).

If Trump was able to tweet and he tweeted "2 + 2 = 4" then the fact that it is Trump is irrelevant to the math that 2+2 does indeed = 4. But you would say "Trump supports injecting bleach and blah blah blah" while ignoring that 2+2=4.

I don't care about all the other stuff. I just care about 2+2=4. If you can't prove otherwise, you go after the source.

It's also interesting to know that Ricter supports this method of attack.
More...

There is a solution for you - STOP POSTING NONSENSE FROM CRAP SOURCES THAT YOU FAIL TO ATTRIBUTE.
 
gwb-trading said:
There is a solution for you - STOP POSTING NONSENSE FROM CRAP SOURCES THAT YOU FAIL TO ATTRIBUTE.
More...

That's the thing. It's not nonsense.

The solution would be if you were more honest, and actually debated the data presented.

If I posted something that said "2+2=5" you could call it nonsense. But that's not what happens. We can debate numbers and data, but you won't.

You can't. And we all know why, brother. We all know why.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jem
What is wrong with the following chart that shows when mask mandates were put in place? This is West Virginia. This chart came from the COVID tracking project and the governor's website. You called these "crap sources".

upload_2021-2-24_14-56-22-png.253009


https://governor.wv.gov/Pages/Statewide-Indoor-Face-Covering-Requirement.aspx

Honest question, GWB. You should be able to answer it...that is, if you want to.
 
Tsing Tao said:
That's the thing. It's not nonsense.

The solution would be if you were more honest, and actually debated the data presented.

If I posted something that said "2+2=5" you could call it nonsense. But that's not what happens. We can debate numbers and data, but you won't.

You can't. And we all know why, brother. We all know why.
More...

Let’s walk through the typical sequence again...

  • Tsing Tao posts a chart with scrub kings on making questionable claims with no attribution of source.
  • Tsing Tao refuses to provide the source when asked for it because he knows it is crap.
  • We search former the source which is always some COVID-denying Tweeter or Blogger who pushes a continuous stream of bullshiat.
  • We explore the claim original source for the underlying data on the chart and clearly demonstrate the chart does not align with the claimed data source.
  • Tsing Tao just posted more questionable charts from the same COVID-denier Twitter account and demands we debunk the information.
  • Sorry Tsing Tao — we are not going to debunk a continuous stream of junk charts you post from the same Twitter account where we have already demonstrated your first chart to be based on fake data.
 
Last edited:
gwb-trading said:
Let’s walk through the typical sequence again...

  • Tsing Tao posts a chart with scrub kings on making questionable claims with no attribution of source.
  • Tsing Tao refuses to provide the source when asked for it because he knows it is crap.
  • We search former the source which is always some COVID-denying Tweeter or Blogger who pushes a continuous stream of bullshiat.
  • We explore the claim original source for the underlying data on the chart and clearly demonstrate the chart does not align with the claimed data source.
  • Tsing Tao just posted more questionable charts from the same COVID-denier Twitter account and demands we debunk the information.
  • Sorry Tsing Tao — this is not going to debunk a continuous stream of junk charts you post from the same Twitter account where we have already demonstrated your first chart to be based on fake data.
More...

Cut and paste again, right futurecurrents? That's all you've got. Post a lie over and over, and hope people accept it. Meanwhile, my request for comment on verifiable data goes unanswered. Again.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top