From the above discussions, several trends become apparent. Firstly there is a problem with convergence and thus the change to contract specifications of KC. More specifically, the changes attempt to encourage delivery (increase in storage rates) and in a sense swing the pendulum to the shorts. Interesting to read how the Board requested the Committee to reconvene and make the changes more eqitable, initial changes probably very slanted towards short (commercial). However, with a 60 cent rally over the past 3 or 4 sessions, I think the changes will do nothing to discourage large fund long positions.
From a larger perspective, record long speculative positions will test the contract specifications of other commodity futures, particularly those with limited underlying physicals (e.g. oats, etc). These contracts were not designed to accomodate the large speculative positions and exchanges are reacting to the consequences instead of being proactive.
Kind of a catch 22 situation for the exchanges, their revenue is based largely on trade volume, but the wrong type of volume challenges the viability of the contract.
In 2008 the Minn. contract went to $26. I think much of wheat happened there is happening to the other wheat contracts. Forget the large wheat carryover, if shorts won't delive it becomes meaningless. In the meantime, make money off of it. Just my 2 cents.
Regards,local