Your ES comments are exactly why I trade the "accordion" trade management with the ES (dynamic position) and I trade fixed position size, entries, and stops on the ER2/NQ/DAX.Quote from austinp:
<i>"I'm with you Austin. Had some gold positions over the last two days that just kept churning until I threw in the towel and then the HUUUUUGE move came."</i>
The damndest part is, had I taken the exact-same trades in ER2 it would have been a 100+ point week. Same trades in NQ would have been more than 200+ points.
ER was much more orderly than ES, and NQ was a lot smoother than both. But, ES has size I need whereas the other two don't.
The ER traders I work with were giddy over trade results there. I'm watching all that unfold on the charts myself. Signals confirm, ER moves off as expected. Meanwhile, the ES chops and churns and chops and churns before finally heading off in the same expected direction.
I trade a 10min trend/signal chart and faster chart for continuation signals. Anyone can learn to read which way price action is leaning at any moment in time: up, down or sideways. It is extremely frustrating to get the correct reads over and over again while being repeatedly stopped in gyrational noise before price action goes from A to B as expected.
*
It was my first real week of trading a fledgling pool. Would have been swell to book +50pts ~ +75pts first week out of the gate. Everyone always wants their best foot forward with something new. Instead we get tape violence, two steps beyond what I'd call volatility.
In time it will all even out. There are some 20+ point profit days ahead of us soon. I can live with averaging +5pts ES per day. The trader in me wants more. Greedy buggers, the whole bunch of us. By Monday I'll have forgotten the whole thing. Weekends are refreshing.
Perspective![]()
My discretionary trading account is up 3.6% for the month of November. My automated accounts are beating my discretionary accounts so far this month as usual.
