Quote from jem:
its more complicated than that.
1. let the people vote... is very valid conservative view point on this issue.
2. conserve what works. How could this be a new Constitutional right. Gays are electing not to marry someone of the opposite sex. But, do they really need a new right to marry someone of the same sex. Why not 3 somes. I just do not see how supporting a new right is libertarian.
3. establish an equal category is a far cleaner solution.
4. get the state out of the marriage game is another if you do not feel the state should encourage the stability of familys.
I do not see any way in which a libertarian could be happy that the CA Sup Ct overturned a vote on the issue.
+ 5