Just wondering what do you guys think is the worser of 2 evils. Its almost a certainty iraq will fall into a full blown civil war. LOL more so then now, the kind of thing lebanon was. But times 2. So what is the worst of 2 evils. Leaving iraq during a full blown civil war or leaving it now.
Whats worse, Full blown civil war, or leaving now in Iraq?
- Thread starter mahram
- Start date
Leaving Iraq now would be leaving during a full blown civil war. And yes, we should leave now. This afternoon would be nice. Whatever comes after we deal with as needed, on whatever scale is required utilizing the FULL force of our military arsenal. Yes, that means what you think it means.
yes captain obvious. Using nukes. Lets see, you blow nukes, in iraq, you iradiate the gulf. Destroying about a third of the worlds oil supply. You also send radioactivity across much of europe and russia. LOL. If russia blew up mexico and sent radiotivity across much of united states. Guess how we will retailiate. LOL its not sensible. Its sort of like saying LAPD should just shoot all the black people.
Represents the Sunnis, Shias and Kurds? 
Laugh now, it's coming and it's unavoidable because radical Isalm won't back off, ever, and they'll have nukes too. If you're under the age of 50 you'll live to see it happen. You're right, Russia won't be happy and they won't be on our side, not that they are now. After seeing the real horror of several million dead the world will come to it's senses. By the end of this century the survivors will be living in a very different world....a peaceful one. Significantly less population, but peaceful. Enjoy the laugh, for now.
As a note, I wouldn't advocate going to war for a barrel of oil. Far as I'm concerned it can go to 500 bucks a barrel tomorrow. Sooner is better, as that will provide the motivation to get off the oil teat.